HE Supreme Court confirmed Sentenced to 44 years in prison applied to the perpetrator of the crime Abanto-Zierbena (Vizcaya)HE He cut his wife and daughter’s throats In March 2020. Judge Vicente Magro, implements sex aggravating and he makes an interesting mention of the concept of human evil, which should not require a defense of psychic change ‘in itself’, as suggested by the person convicted in this case.
With its decision, the Supreme Court finalized the sentence given to Faustino MS, who killed his wife and daughter while they were sleeping on the sofa at home, and who was the perpetrator of two murders for treason with the aggravating factor of gender. and the second in bed in his room.
Faustino admitted during the trial to killing both women, ages 56 and 24, hitting their heads with a sledgehammer and then slitting their throats. An explosion that, according to his statement, he could not control. The next day he informed his own family, and they reported him.
Savagery
The verdict highlights the “brutality of the circumstances in which the two crimes were committed” and adds: “The grotesqueness of these acts is categorically affectation of conscience and will The subject who acts this way because “the evil of man in these cases of crime within the family cannot imply some kind of presumption or supposition that the soul of the subject has changed.”
He also touches on the fact that psychiatric experts emphasize that: evil is not a psychotic categoryHowever, it simply refers to people who commit a crime, undertake the evil of the action, and have the knowledge and will to cause it, but cannot put this behavior into a psychotic category.
At the time, the jury stated that the defendant killed his wife and daughter in response to their status as women. act of domination, After previously displaying an authoritarian attitude over them, he imposed his will and at the same time made them an offer. notable physical superiority. He was sentenced to 22 years in prison for each crime.
Faustino resorted to applying the aggravating factor of gender to his case; To this the Supreme Court responded that this case was repeated in other similar crimes. “persistence of the man’s sense of possessiveness towards the woman” this requires analyzing them from a gender perspective. The attitude is repeated on the girl child, “a indirect extension of domination“Because they are both women.
In such cases the Supreme Court now reminds us that: the writer perceives that he has failed In creating the physical and psychological bonds he aims to establish in the soul of the victim (mother and her own daughter) and in ending the lives of both. According to the Supreme Court, all of this occurred after the convicted man had previously “exhibited authoritarian behavior over persons acting according to his will.”
In this case, Faustino’s intention is not only to kill, but also to do it disproportionately, As stated in the exposition of proven facts and their defining severity, in the opinion of the Supreme Court it “profoundly delves into the sense of mastery and ownership of the author who expresses the revealed fact and the reasons motivating the crime, attributing the determinant of the crime to the factor of ending the crime.” It tells the lives of two women, the way he executes them.