The engineer who certified the Mislata bouncy castle said that he was at the fair but forgot his mobile phone.

No time to read?
Get a summary

Engineer documenting the owner bouncy castle flying away in Mislata On January 4, with eleven children inside, Caused the death of two girls aged 4 and 8, Vera and Cayetanainsisted before this wednesday investigating judge number 4 to misla yes, inspected the attraction ‘on the spot’ and the rest of the fairgrounds and your mobile phone positioned on the Elx that daywhere his professional office is located, because “left behind” in the office. He argued that this was the reason. He didn’t take a photo either. tried to explain to the facilities that, as always, no images were found in the responsible disclosure report.

Again, did something like slippingbecause while trying to explain that he was in Mislata, conducted the audit on December 2, not December 3 -the fair was set up for a month until the accident happened-, initially agreed with the municipal technician go to the fairground together, because on the 3rd day “I drank xativa“on another professional visit.

Expert witness José Pablo BL, who admitted that he only answered his lawyer’s questions, while making this statement, police report what puts I doubt its presence in Mislata on December 2 is based on analysis of the geolocation of your mobile phoneboth on December 2 and in the days following located in Elx, as predicted only Levante-EMV, a newspaper that is part of this media as well as the Prensa Ibérica group. The only time the mobile phone is connected Valencia antennas a month later, on January 7exactly that day appeared in front of the group Murders will testify for the deadly accident that occurred three days ago.

The legal owner of the castle, both the engineer of the Mislata Fair and the owners of the attractions. Alejandro CS and his father-in-law, José Antonio MA, appeared in court for the first time this Thursday morning as part of the criminal proceedings brought by both parties. reckless murders.

The first to appear The engineer who came to the courthouse before 10:30 in the morningDespite being summoned at 11:30, he tried to stay away from the media gathering at the courthouse.

as he Like her father-in-law, the fair came much later, after 12:00.knowing that his trial has been postponed due to his lawyer attending another hearing in the City of Justice of Valencia. For this reason the tour the explanations didn’t start until one in the afternoonafter all parties to the case are present, that is, in addition to the judge and the prosecutor, two lawyers of special charges –Jorge Carbo, On behalf of Vera’s parents, Y Pedro Javier Gil TorresFor Cayetana- and three defenses.

Just not asked about them charm anchors and despite its location on the fairground, different from what was allowed and why the castle was not dismantled Winds before 53.2 km Per the hour with the kids inside blowing up the charm.

Likewise, they were asked. Who was the ‘ghost’ employee whose existence they denied? and at least 13 people who are confident that it was the young North African man who approved the tickets and controlled the use of the facility.

Vera’s family’s lawyer, one of the girls who died. German Knight

Vera’s family’s lawyer, Mr. Valencian criminal Jorge Carbo when he got to court he had apparently already testified They hoped that “all unknowns that still exist in the case will be clarified”. Carbó made clear reference to the fact that the rest of the attraction and the fairgrounds were not built in accordance with the project submitted to him. Municipality of Mislata approved by; because it was started and then inflatable castle to the wind that blows before the last and final; if the engineer actually did the tracking from Elx, as evident from the police analysis of the cell phone; or how many workers the seller has at the time and what their employment status is, among others.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Russian pharmacies can start selling food, clothes and chewing gum

Next Article

‘Back to Reims’: real political cinema