“I sucked you clam: I’d sleep with someone with a clean pussy for once”; “everybody says so I’m a pervert and all that, but no one can sue me because I masturbated thinking of you“; “Don’t be like those who want to report me”. Some of the messages coming from the application are as follows: What’s upsent an escort An official of the Murcian town of Abarán City Council that ended when it was revealed, convicted sexual harassment. It’s not just them: “Only you bring me to my twenties”someone else prayed.
The subject read: “No one can sue me for masturbating thinking about you.”
Although the judgment Criminal Court No. 2 of Murcia The person who challenged the decision issued in November 2022 appealed and now the County Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision: five months in jail and special disqualification for employment or public office. This, stop being an officer. For three years, he will not be able to come within a hundred meters of the woman he abused and brought him to court. Do not communicate with him in any way.
The facts considered proven occurred within a few years and It broke out five years ago when one of the victims denounced the case.. This person, now 51, was a career officer at the Konsistory, located in this municipality’s Plaza Vieja, and was dedicated to being “insulting and humiliating” because of his position. piss off your friends He took advantage of his position in public office”.
“These statements in the context of work, not leisure, no matter how much they make others laugh, are more than outlandish statements,” the court understands.
Also, “sometimes, at the beginning of the working day, kissed his friends surprisingly entering the workplace”, detailing his account of proven facts. His colleague, who decided to report what happened, to the Judge He once received a photo of the subject “with a bare body and an implicit gesture” via WhatsApp.. There are also messages like, “You can’t imagine people calling me a pervert and then asking me for something.”
“Express request”
In his appeal, the individual’s defense argued that what he did “at most” could be classified as “no unfair harassment”. “Requirements for the application sexual favorsThe victim is not put in an objective and seriously intimidating, hostile or humiliating situation, there is no regular or permanent business relationship between the victim and the perpetrator.
While rejecting the objection, the court stated that it was clear that there was no explicit request, but an implied request, regarding the two sexual assistance requests, in the behavior of the accused against the victim.
In this sense, the Court emphasizes that “messaging with a bare-bodied photo increases, comments like ‘you just showed me in your twenties’ or ‘I used to suck a clam for once’”. I was going to sleep with someone with a clean pussy’ this has evolved over time, implicitly imply that request, without the need for the request to be explicit, as stated.. “And these expressions go beyond the profane or grotesque expressions that have evolved over time in the context in which they were produced, not in the context of leisure, but on the contrary in the context of work, lack of unjustified harassment, which is old and already repealedno matter how much they can provoke the laughter of other people present when they are uttered, but not the person who receives them,” emphasizes the sentence.