This Investigation demanded four years in prison for lawyer in Alicante for an ongoing crime document forgery in competition with the crime fraud aggravated for allegedly cheating on a client during a legal proceeding. The Office of the Chief Public Prosecutor decided to continue the detention request of a defendant in the trial held at the hearing. 535.000 Euro compensation Despite the death of the victim residing in Switzerland and his heirs refusing to pursue their claims.
The lawyer denied the charges and defense attorney Rubén Pérez, requested yours forgiveness It is a matter accepted by the court that the statement given by the client at that time was not included in the investigation phase due to the absence of the defense of the accused.
According to the public accusation, the victim contacted Alicante’s lawyer in October 2011 to deal with the issue of embezzlement by some of his father’s relatives. they would steal money from their accounts banking. According to the information given by the prosecutor, the accused made a request by making the woman believe that he had initiated a procedure. money in the concept of providing funds, deposits and suretyship.
Thus, he managed to get him to surrender up to 226,000 euros, and the lawyer would have deceived him by issuing false judicial decisions, summoning the victim several times to a court. show trialalways suspended and even led him to believe that his relatives were arrested and appealed to the Constitutional Court.
According to the Ministry of Public He had to sell his house in Switzerland. to face repeated demands for money from the defendant. He claimed 535 thousand euros for compensation, for the economic damage he suffered, travel expenses and the psychological damage he caused.
In his statement, the lawyer denied that he had sent some emails and assured that he did not take any action on his behalf. She stated that she worked for him for eight years. gave him “about 90,000 euros” and that he hired him to “move” his father’s assets as he became his guardian after he was disabled by an accident and received further compensation. 800,000 euros.
Although the court did not accept the victim’s testimony, according to the expert’s report, the prosecutor of the case noted that in his report there were numerous documents proving the deception, including a contract that his client did not sign.