letter that Three associations representing the Justice Administration (LAJ) lawyers Among other demands, return of money held during the two-month strike with which they have Average salary increase of 450 euros gross per monthhas managed to gather all the unions in the sector under one roof. severe criticism to its content.
Like him strike committee bringing together justice officials INTERNSHIP, CSIF, CCOO and UGTaspect inter-union They published two separate statements on their pages, which they attributed harsh qualities to the letter, and described it as follows: “classy, childish, and humiliation and envy gushing all over him”, In addition “should be written from pride ».
In a statement to the strike committee, National Association of College, Progressive Union, and Independent Justice Administration Lawyers sent a few days ago Minister Llop shows more «little interest in public service (LAJ) and an obsession with comparing himself to everyone around him without valuing what they are, let alone understanding modern labor relations».
Former court clerks stated in their writings that with their strikes, they paved the way for the demands of other judicial groups, and that this could not be based on the salaries they did not receive during their protests.
And they warned. judges and prosecutors strike announcement and since the end of April general corps officials also for a salary increase that “won’t allow” salary difference cIt continues to increase along with other groups of the Ministry of Justice in our same category, and each time it gets narrower than the lower ones ».
Intersindikal who thinks that what they really want is “the ministry gives them” two months paid leave He adds that the LAJ still does not understand that they are civil servants like us, not the judiciary. Having coffee with a judge doesn’t make you the same as a judge», add to prompt immediately “Why are they the only officials of the Justice Department whose program is not controlled? Or why is a lack of control allowed?».
“Not all of them”
The strike committee, which “wants to think that this communiqué does not represent the whole of the LAJ and does not represent that supreme judicial body,” considers it “something more serious than its content”, “the worst of the letter”. This tarnishing their professional reputation as public servants Both within the judiciary and before the society.
A loss of prestige, they add, “with their stance forcing the suspension of cases without legal support, they have already won during their strike. degrading treatment by sending it to the remaining staff of the judicial authorities, “order cabinet” and pressure them not to even work on a sketch ».
According to the four unions, “a style of work that disqualifies them (referring to their role in the new judicial office) from leading anything because You cannot cause contempt, envy and arrogance».
The letter also states that they are considering “The deterioration of the wage balance between the groups is unjustified” and Any increase in the general complement of the position or any other concept applied generically and indiscriminately to all general or special bodies, as well as to judges and prosecutors, must also benefit. LAJ”.
“His Dark Side”
An approach in which, in the strike committee’s opinion, the three groups of forensic lawyers “show their darkest side (…) because (…) They ask the government not to succumb to just claims, the rest of the Justice staff, including judges and prosecutors, whether they believe it or not.
At this point, the Committee reminds that “the action of the trade union organizations of the Sectoral Council has always benefited from the action of the LAJ organ, even from mobilizations and strikes in which they did not participate”.
By the way, “these LAJ associations, institutional and non-solidarity, they are busy hinder the rights of other personnel Positioning themselves and acting against internal promotion (…) they act more class-oriented or more than the associations themselves, in matters for which they have so far received the invaluable support of the Ministry of Justice».
WRITTEN OF INTERINDICAL
“LAJ is not the Judgment. Drinking coffee with a judge doesn’t make you the same as a judge »
“The letter spreads contempt and envy towards the classist and other officials and the judiciary”
“If they’re civil servants, why aren’t they the only ones in the Justice Department whose hours are not controlled?”
“They wanted to see the judges and prosecutors celebrating the assemblies with candles at the doors of the courts and dragging the cardboard coffins along the Gran Via as they did.”
STRIKE COMMITTEE LETTER (INTERNSHIP, CSIF, CC OO AND UGT)
“We want to think that this statement, written by the arrogance of the associations, does not represent all the lawyers of the Ministry of Justice.”
“They show their scant interest in the public service and their obsession with comparing themselves to everyone else without valuing what they are or understanding modern labor relations”
“The worst part of that letter is the damage to the professional reputation of public officials both in the judiciary and in the society.”