Alicante State Court condemned a total of 11 years in prison 22 years old for trying to kill Another of 29 hammer blows robs him. The attack took place both after he was called to settle a dispute over a debt related to the sale of drugs, and the accused must pay the victim a substantial amount of pending compensation as outlined in the sentence. However, the prosecutor demanded. more than 100,000 Euros for injuries and sequelae that the victim suffers. The decision, which can be appealed, carries a prison sentence of 7 years and 6 months for attempted murder and 3 years and 6 months for theft using violence.
The events declared proven in the sentence reported by the Tenth Division of the trial this week occurred on Pintor Cabrera de Alcoy street on the morning of May 12, 2021. The defendant made an appointment with another young man to meet that day to settle their dispute over a small debt that the defendant had asked the victim to pay.
History close to a bar
The victim got out of his house and waited for the accused by a bar on Pintor Cabrera street. It was around half past ten in the morning when the accused arrived on a scooter and got off. took a hammer and went to the young man who owed him money. He dealt several blows with the hammer, but was attacked. He escaped the crash with the help of a chair.
“For you to kill me”, even the defendant said he kept hammering first. One of the blows hit him severely on the head, “knowing that it was very likely to cause death when it reached him». According to the sentence, the blow hit the left side of his head and he immediately fell to the ground.
Lying on the floor and tapping the trunk, the accused took his cell phone from him and leave the place on the scooter. The defendant then went to the bar where the mother was working and handed him the hammer, telling him to either wash it or get rid of it.
According to the court ruling, the victim suffered a head injury that took several months to stabilize and had sequelae that caused her incapacity or “difficulty in activities of daily living”. Mass.
Both admitted that they had met to discuss a dispute over the sale of drugs, and although the defendant admitted that he had hit him, he claimed that he found the hammer in place and used it in self-defense. court finds correct “lack of credit”
Regarding the victim’s phone number, the defendant stated that he had received it by mistake, believing that it belonged to him, and the Court considered that he had said this in a clearing spirit.