The court ordered a Singaporean worker who left after receiving a bonus to return the money to the company, it writes. mothership.
At the hearing, he argued that he was not entitled to the bonus because the company he worked for wrote a letter of resignation. However, it was too late to cancel the transaction as the payment had already been processed. The Singaporean responded by saying that no such clause was specified in the employment contract, so he refused to return the money.
However, company representatives announced that the company has an Employee Handbook detailing this item. The court concluded that the man was aware of the existence of this document, after the personnel department told him about it when the accused found a job.
The man claimed that he “did not think” that the handbook would specify the terms of the bonus, as his contract stated that bonus payments were made twice, in December and March. As a result, the court took the company’s side and compelled the former employee to make a “refundable payment.”
Before, a woman quit her job that she didn’t like and started to earn money. in candid shots.