HE Supreme Court of Justice Valencian Community (TSJCV) upheld the court’s decision. Castellon County Court who sentenced Ten-year prison sentence for Moncofa resident for deliberately murdering an underage child from Villarreal thinking that the young man harassment, harassment and threats via text messages What’s up until he took his own life more than six years ago. The decision came after a while media judgment For the facts told and the popular jury finally pleading guilty moon of the month of July.
In a long sentence of more than 50 pages accessible Mediterrenian, TSJCV rejects the appeal of 62-year-old defendant Vicente Paradísdemanded his acquittal. Similarly, He also rejects the appeal made by the special prosecutor’s office.that is, they requested that the aggravating factor be taken into account by the parents of the deceased young person and that the punishment be given in the upper half. shores as in the operand. Family requested 15 years leave prison during the trial.
“After examining the facts presented to us, the judge who tried the case may conclude that today the appellant was not unaware of the emotional impact this asymmetry had on him as a result. the victim, indifferent to the outcome, and in accordance with the doctrine of objective attribution, allows the entry of eventual fraud and his conviction as the perpetrator of willful manslaughter without the consent of changing the terms of liability,” he says, almost prevailing in the end.
119 messages in three hours
Likewise, the judgment states that, from Paradís’ conversation with the minor and from other evidence conducted, “he was clearly revealed beyond any reasonable doubt by repeated threatening messages”. There were 119 people in almost three hours, and as he had begged the young man to stop fifty times and stated his intention to commit suicide at least ten times, posing a danger to the young man’s life, he created this risk, the mortal outcome hanging over the minor was not legally considered appropriate.
Therefore, the TSJCV now upholds the Court’s decision that the accused is guilty of willfully causing the death of the minor, and considers that the main incriminating evidence is valid, namely the removal of all messages from the deceased’s cell phone. in accordance with the terminal’s chain of custody. This is how the defendant accepts the messages of “this is making love, suffer the consequences”, “what would you do if I blackmail you now?”, “you’re involved in this”. problem and you will pay the price”, “if you commit suicide you will leave the blame on your parents”, “you will shed bloody tears in front of the judges and your parents”.
family compensation
In addition to his prison sentence, Paradis, who is still free due to these events, was ordered by the court to pay the family of the deceased youth £146,000 in compensation. euro and his brother as legal liability with 27,000. The parents, who testified as witnesses at the hearing, watched each and every one of the events from the courtroom with great emotion and horror. After learning of the verdict last July, they assured this newspaper that “justice has finally been served” and that their son will “rest in peace”.
TSJCV’s decision can be appealed to the Supreme Court.