It’s not new, daring, or exhaustive, just a summary of the obvious, and his views on the war have been heard thousands of times, but he underscores it. chinese paper like mediator. The relevance of the Chinese peace plan to the Ukraine conflict emerged in its own report. first anniversaryIt will depend on the commitment of Russia. end meeting inside Moscow between senior diplomat Chinesewith Wang Yi Russian President Vladimir Putinone of the most optimistic agreed plan can get this set of meaningless generalizations closer to something. road map.
HE I respect for sovereignty leading the plan of all countries. The strict interpretation proposes the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine, but not from China. diplomatic jugglingtired of asking for the first without mentioning the second for a year.
Document from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, end between war And beginning between talks without specifying any program or prerequisites. Oblique reviews Washington where it needs to end the cold war mentality or make it clear that one country cannot ensure its own security at the expense of others. beijing He attributes the blame for the disaster in Ukraine to Moscow. overwhelming presence between NATO It’s in Russia’s backyard, much like what China took in the Pacific.
End of sanctions
The post also requests the end of any sanctions. UN Security Council. due in practice Russia’s veto in the organ, it is equivalent to removing them all. “Unilateral sanctions and excessive pressure will not only solve problems but also create new ones. The countries concerned should stop abusing unilateral sanctions and play a role in cooling the crisis,” the document said.
In the section on warnings to Moscow, in addition to respect for Russia Ukrainian sovereigntyunderstand denial of the use of nuclear weapons Who is Putin dating? Nor is it new: the President has already said, Xi Jinpingduring a recent visit to Beijing by his German counterpart, Olaf Scholz. The reminder comes days after Putin withdrew from the last nuclear arms control agreement with the United States.
HE chinese plan it won’t please everyone, and it falls far short of the expectations Wang had recently aroused by declaring it the direct route to a “political agreement.” Munich Security Summit. However, considering its shortcomings, it comes from a country that was the first to emerge after a year of war and had weight and excellent relations. Moscow And Kyiv.
beijing From the outset of the conflict it was stated as follows: only possible mediator However Moscow And Washington hopes were dashed. The first excludes dialogue until you have solid positions on the battlefield that will increase your power at the negotiating table. The second has tried to deny China’s neutrality with stubborn announcements about arms shipments that will reach Russia very soon and never will. Chinese With his plan, he seeks the role of a peace fighter in the face of intentions to expand the plan he attributes to himself. United States of America In reference to his large arms and gas sales to Europe.
EU and NATO response
Both of them European Union aspect Atlantic Alliance They took the Chinese plan to the extreme Attention and even with reproaches. A few days before Russia launched its tanks at its neighbor, President Vladimir Putin signed an “unlimited” friendship treaty with President Xi, while “China doesn’t have much credibility because they couldn’t condemn the illegal invasion of Ukraine”. said the partnership Jens Stoltenberg At a press conference he attended in Tallinn (Estonia) with the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der LeyenTo commemorate the 105th anniversary of Estonia’s independence from the Russian Empire on such a symbolic date.
“This is not a peace plan, but a set of principles they share. We need to examine them against the background, and that is when China chooses a side, for example, by signing an agreement. unlimited friendship (with Russia) Just before the invasion of Ukraine began. So we will of course examine the principles, but we will also take into account the background to which China takes sides.” He is “selective and inadequate” in some of the principles of the United Nations charter.
“China’s position is based on an erroneous focus on parties’ supposedly legitimate security interests and concerns, implying a justification for the illegal invasion of Russia and blurring the role of aggressor and aggressor. The position does not say who to say. Who is the aggressor and the victim? unjustified war of aggression. Let’s be frank, this war can end if Russia abides by international law and unconditionally stops its offensive and withdraws its forces and military equipment from Ukrainian territory within internationally recognized borders.”
weapon supply
Regarding the possibility of Beijing providing “lethal aid” to Moscow, the former Norwegian prime minister admitted that this has not happened until now, but “we have seen signs and signals that China is planning or considering providing military aid to Russia. China should not do this, because that would be supporting an illegal war of aggression, violating international law and the United Nations Charter.” Special responsibility to protect the letter”. “This is a war of aggression that violates exactly this requirement.” The Community Manager is also aware of information pointing to a possible shipment of military supplies by Beijing. Spokesperson Nabila Massrali said, “We don’t have clear evidence at this time, but “We urge China to refrain from any military assistance to the aggressor,” he said.