About four months after his accession, the British still Charles III and I wonder about the reign of a figure that doesn’t move hearts. In his short term as a long-standing monarch, he multiplied his presence at public events. welcomed with moderate enthusiasm, several times avoided discarded eggs with some displeasure, which led to a review of its safety. In these appearances he was often accompanied by the princes of Wales.
William, Kate and their three “cute” children (mandatory statement in the press) are the main heroes of the world. new organizational chart related to actual obligations. They provide the image of an idyllic family that the British monarchy needs so much. the wound he inflicted traumatic breakup related to Harry damage the brilliance of the institution. The last controversy came after his death. Isabel II. More blame, more mutual blame, in a conflict beyond Palacio’s control.
Through the prism of Netflix
two series related to Netflix disturbed the aged monarch’s debut. fifth season ‘Crown’ revived at the worst moment of years unhappy marriage with Diana of WalesThe dual life of the unfaithful husband and lover Camila, facts that the British cannot completely forgive. The second depth charge came with the series “Harry and Meghan”, another global event.
Allegations of racism and manipulative manipulations by noble advisers have resurfaced in collaboration with the press. A millionaire viewer enjoyed the details of the family meeting in Sandringham, where two brothers quarreled, screams were heard, and according to his vengeful son, Carlos lied. The spread of the series and the release of Harry’s memoir ‘Backup’ in January, they are bullying and shadowing the new reign. The progress of this book has been devastating: In it, Harry accuses his older brother of hitting her after a fight with Meghan. The king cannot leave or hide grudge, unhappiness and family account.
Imperial and Commonwealth history
Protecting the institution is its primary duty. Charles III at a time when the world is beginning to reconsider the imperial past of the great monarchs and the countries they represent. ‘Royal’ visits former colonies according to recent experience it is becoming more and more problematic. The accusation of exploiting slavery and economic compensations. For now, the king is determined to preserve the kingdom’s legacy. British Commonwealth, He is prudent in his comments about it.
The monarch is doing a little internal changes He asked the Parliament to prepare the document. necessary legislation to add princess mom and Prince Edward to the list of Members of the Council of State charged with acting in the event of the monarch’s temporary absence or incapacity. There is speculation that Kate They can also be appointed as consultants. Positions currently go to five adults in a row, Camilla, William, Harry, Andrew, and their daughter, Princess Beatrice. However, the latter has no official role in the royal family and the same is true of Harry and Andrew cast aside for affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile gang.
Solemn and burdensome coronation
2023, this spring’s big event for Carlos III, is marked by his solemn coronation. next 6 may At Westminster Abbey. in the same action Camila will be crowned queen. This is the first time something like this has happened since 1937. The anointed at the time was Elizabeth, the current monarch’s grandmother, who eventually became the queen mother. details of the call Operation Golden Globes They are kept secret, but rumors of a possible simpler and less cumbersome staging were quickly dismissed, although the event’s duration was shorter. The ceremony has hardly changed in the last 1000 years, it is unique in the world and at the same time very burdensome. The coronation of Elizabeth II in 1953, 52 million current euro. What your child can do double yourself. In the midst of a cost-of-living crisis, it will be the government and taxpayers who pay the bill because it is a corporate action. In his first Christmas speech, the King lamented the difficulties faced by those who did not know how to feed or warm their families. Journalist David Osland, given the poignancy of his words, “Charles III could have declared that he preferred to donate the £100 million earmarked for his coronation to food banks.”