Incompetence often only serves to create vicious arguments. A good example of this is the national animal welfare bill, which almost no one likes and whose preparation, not to mention, veterinarians do not trust.
To date, the law has produced debates that, far from solving anything, have only succeeded in pitting everyone against each other. The last one touched on whether hunting dogs should be included in the new law. The fact that a law did not have the flexibility to do this from the very beginning reveals the gaps and incompetence in the drafting of the law very clearly.
PSOE has told its government partner that it will support it for all dogs except hunting dogs. United We Can, the author of the law in question, admitted that this applies not when hunting for dogs, but when they are at home. However, it is not so easy to solve, in this case, how to arrange the dog’s rehala? Will some argue that their dog is always hunting?
The biggest problem faced by the protection of animals in our country is being held hostage by whims rather than ideologies. Just as a bridge is not built depending on which party the engineer votes for, one solution or another cannot be applied to animals depending on who is in government at the time. For this reason, and as always, before approving an election law that does not protect animals, it is necessary to listen to technical and scientific criteria and make them the norm. In this way, we will ensure common sense and effectiveness.
A national animal protection law is very necessaryYes, but no one should take advantage of this and use the corset to make a brochure, because it doesn’t fit, even all the animals that want to be arranged in it.