Your lawyer, who appeared on television as a representative of Zoe’s victims, appeared on social networks at the time. Ignatius Trimarcois a close friend Michelangelo PierreThe mediatic and expensive lawyer who defended Cositorto and number 2 in the organization was also arrested. Maximiliano Javier Batista.
In addition to this statement on Twitter, in August 2020, at the end of last December, while the Zoe case was already in full swing and on the occasion of Eid al-Adha celebrations. trimarco’s birthdayPierri could be seen kissing and hugging him at the party.
Shortly after that, Trimarco appeared on television as an advocate for Zoe’s victims, charging them between $200 and $500 in advance. However, as this newspaper learned, lawyer warns clients about friendship with Pierridespite reassuring them that one thing is personal and the other business.
Trimarco respected those gathered in this way. Federal Capital Public Bar AssociationIn point D of section 19 of chapter 6 of the Code of Ethics, “the attorney’s inform your customer immediately friendship, kinship or frequency of contact with the other party, or any other circumstance that could reasonably be a decisive reason for the client to terminate the professional relationship”.
However City of Buenos Aires Bar Association In its deontological code, it does not endorse the acceptance of subjects under these conditions. You can do this in article 19 of the “Qualifications of an Attorney” section, where a lawyer “also refrain from interfering (…) where a cause of friendship or kinship may hinder their independence. In short, a subject that only allows for serious, frank and fair discussion should be accepted.”
Some of Zoe’s victims disfigured Trimarco with a default expression. reluctance to complainbecause he was going to take a trip to New York without taking on that mission first, something that, in his view, would benefit the other party.
another image two lawyers togetherTaken from a video broadcast on Argentine television, it aroused further suspicion among the victims.
Amid the controversy, a video of Trimarco being posted on Twitter appears to be the first time Zoe has been unaware of trust agreements. leaked online He then began feeding social networks, claiming that talking about it was “dangerous for investigation, and also “contains people” (referring to his clients). conspiracy theory Between him and Pierri.
in the same program Gabriel Gonzalez aka “Rosita”Because he was a victim or accomplice of Cositorto, Trimarco openly assured that “for me he is an undoubted victim”.
That was before Cositorto’s collaborator, who hosted shows, premieres and events in different countries, even traveled with him by private jet. He would reject Zoe and argue that she was just a student. their coaching courses.
The aforementioned translator, for which Cositorto sponsored a game, actively promoted Zoe’s work at numerous events in different countries, even advertised cryptocurrency on television. Zoe Cash It says it would be worth $55 when trading at 0.0002 Euro today.
Trimarco’s message about Gabriel González changed, though he did not directly mention his name. After his “betrayal” to Cositorto.
Open discussion about that time ethics and aesthetics In the Zoe case, both attorneys’ attitudes intensified after the celebration of another birthday, in this case Pierri’s.
And this was not only because of the expected participation of his colleague and friend Trimarco, but also because of his presence at the party. leonardo nastacioA young man who appears on television as Zoe’s first alleged accuser in Buenos Aires City.
Leonardo Nastacio, 21 years old and “actor” just fansI said on a few TVs, always accompanied by Trimarco, received only $5,300 worth of the hypothetical money ($8,000) he had invested in Zoe in January, but not his February fee or March fee. He also talked about the trust agreement, emphasizing that it’s a “three-year” contract.
By chance, Two pillars of Pierri’s strategy In Cositorto’s defense, all payments were timely until the Christmas bot, which had performed 100% in 3 months, caused the first violations; and about trust agreementsSince it has been 3 years, there has been a delay in payments, not fraud.
Another point Trimarco has repeatedly insisted on public interventions is Zoe’s did not have legal authority Trading such investments.
This argument falls directly on the backs of another of the defendants in the Zoe case, the legal director, the former judge. Hector Luis YrimiaCositorto and number 2 Maximiliano Javier Batista is the person Pierri stopped representing when he decided to take full responsibility for what happened.
To be precise, there is nothing legally reprehensible in Trimarco and Pierri’s actions to date. Now they ask as many questions as they do they feed suspicion. They were not slow to appear on social networks, even by other lawyers:
And they appear reasonable questions What:
why travel always the same victim on TVDoes anyone even mention the dozens of victims and people who, according to Trimarco himself, have invested much higher sums, selling their homes for up to $70,000?
It turns out that he was the victim of a scam that, he said, included his family? emotionally sunkShall we go to the birthday party of the lawyer defending his swindler?
Coincidentally, the arguments of Trimarco’s accusation? queue a lot Was it directed against those in defense of his friend Pierri, and Yrimia, who eventually became the scapegoat for Cositorto and Batista?
Even if “Caesar’s wife should not only be honest, she should appear that way,” isn’t it? keep looking a little?
Are there really no victims for whom the situation awakens? the slightest doubt?
near extradition to Argentina Leonardo Cositorto, who arrived at Ezeiza airport this morning (Spanish time), who we saw being transferred by Interpol as he was leaving Santo Domingo in the video above today, was able to solve some of these unknowns.