Emissions 50% higher than automakers declare

A new report revealed that Pollution from fossil fuel vehicles higher than previously thought. This is because many brands declare less emissions than their cars produce. In some cases there is an excess of 116%.

Global emissions from auto companies, on average, 50% higher than they declared And with mandatory reporting of Scope 3 emissions in 2023, asset managers associated with carbon-intensive automakers are facing a “carbon bomb,” according to a Transport and Environment report (TEA).

In particular, as stated in the document of this international environmental organization, the Hyundai-Kia group, 116%then a BMW 81%and Toyota, a 69%. It was followed by Mercedes-Benz (62%), the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance (61%) and Volkswagen (58%).

European Union in 2023 introduce a requirement for financial institutions to disclose scope 3 emissions (indirect emissions) fully affect asset managers who are exposed to vehicle manufacturers. Unlike furniture or mobile phone manufacturers, the majority (98%) of automobile companies’ emissions correspond to Scope 3, primarily from automobile use.

The graph below shows the excess emissions detected by the study:

Excessive emissions above declared TEA


Automakers base their declared total emissions on a number of factors, such as average vehicle size, where it is driven, and the useful life of the vehicles. T&E says automakers are using selective data to get a lower figure.

They don’t capture the “real climate impact” of companies

The report states that in terms of investment of automobile companies, almost as carbon intensive as the oil industry. At current prices, an average investment of one million euros in oil giants Exxon Mobil, BP and Shell finances around 5,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (CO2e). The same amount finances more than 4,500 tons of CO2e in the automotive sector.

By the end of the year, Morningstar, a United States-based financial firm, Estimates that around 50% of all new financial products sold will be based on environmental aspects, social and governance (ESG). But T&E criticizes that ESG ratings don’t capture the “real climate impact” of companies.

The environmental group therefore requests the European Union to regulate and harmonize the ESG rating methodology in order to guarantee consistent and transparent information about the data.

Emissions 50% higher than vehicle manufacturers declare PEXELS


“According to official data, a euro invested in a car company finances almost the same amount of carbon as a euro in an oil company. This should be a wake-up call for the financial industry. It will have to start.”

Full report (in English): https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Carbon-ESG-finance-Car-Study-Final.pdf

…..

Environment department contact address:crisclimatica@prensaiberica.es

Source: Informacion

Popular

More from author

Russian company can build a large wind farm in Vietnam 16:16

Russian company Zarubezhnft can build a wind farm with a capacity of 1 GW in Vietnam. This was stated by Russian President Vladimir Putin,...

Pakistan opened the airspace after the ceasefire with India 16:04

In Pakistan, after announcing an agreement on the end of the fire between Islamabad and New Delhi, the airspace was opened for any flights....

He invited Vietnam Putin to visit the country 16:26

Russian President Vladimir Putin accepted his invitation to visit Vietnam. This was stated by the Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Vietnam...

Ukraine heard the Failure of Mobilization 16:04

Ukrainian officials failed in the mobilization process. This, Ukraine television channel Espreso'nun 116. separate mechanized Brigade Yuri Maximov'dan Ukrainian Armed Forces Volunteers Recruitment Center...