Netflix makes the voices of La Manada victims heard: “The time that passed was very important”

“The surviving victims and those who supported and accompanied them at the time never had a place to speak. No one had heard their experiences. This documentary film gives them a voice for the first time,” they emphasize. Almudena Carracedo and Robert BaharThe directors of this study, which includes statements from professionals who accompanied the Sanfermines victim (police, lawyers, prosecutors, social workers), journalists and the mayor of Pamplona, Joseba Asiron. “For those involved in this story, the time since the Supreme Court decision was crucial: the majority did not want to talk until now,” the filmmakers recall.

They stopped talking to them defense lawyers They think of La Manada, who “has had countless opportunities in the past to share their testimonies.” They appear here in archive images. “The documentary is almost five year perspectivewith facts proven by the courts and Last decision of the Supreme Court. “This film does not attempt to confront versions in order to make a judgment,” they justify.

imaginary names

The directors were in constant contact with the relatives of the Sanfermines shooting victim, who chose not to be directly involved. in the movie Her fictitious name is Lucia. and his words “literally come from him” judicial statements and two letters The one he sent to the press.” Actor Natalia de Molina He is the one who gives it a voice. “I wanted this to happen and I closed my eyes so I wouldn’t find out anything,” she said, recalling how the girl experienced the traumatic events.

Young woman attacked by La Manada PozoblancoThe person whose pseudonym is given in the documentary Pigeon, Yes, he gave them an interview and the actor Carolina Yuste He sang his real words. Both victims deal with the extra suffering caused by being the center of attention, for example, and feeling judged in a case where some defense attorneys went from set to set and a journalist even launched a poll as to whether the incident was rape or consensual sex, necessitating consideration of the media’s role.

“In many cases, the desire to be told all details, including those that are not necessary to establish that a criminal act has been committed, re-victimizes victims and does not contribute much to analyzing the situation as a whole. In these and many other cases, there needs to be deep reflection about our collective and individual responsibility vis-à-vis the balance between what the public needs to know and what might re-victimize a victim,” echoes Carracedo and Bahar, who need more three and a half years of shooting to conduct this study.

The team examined more than a thousand hours of archival material and recorded More than 60 hours of interviews. Many refer to turning point He was referring to this case. “What set this story apart from the thousands of horrific stories of sexual violence experienced by women was what emerged from it: the electrifying and massive social response,” the directors emphasize.

#Say it and #Done

“This case was the last straw that broke the camel’s back thousands of people will demonstrateraised the awareness of an entire generation consent and sexual violence against women and we created this #To count (#MeToo and its predecessor in Spanish #FinishedThe makers of the film, “in which thousands of women tell about their experiences of sexual assault for the first time through social networks,” emphasize that they hope that this work will serve to “reduce” such cases and “confront them with more sensitivity and support in the future.”

It was important for them to highlight that “there is a third victim in the film who tragically did not survive: Nagore Laffage“, was killed in Sanfermines in 2008. His mother, Asun Casasola, describes her daughter’s death and how she relived it when the La Manada case came to light. Because Nagore, like many other women who died due to gender violence, can no longer make her own voice heard.