Court of Alicante condemned two and a half years in prison to an accused man repeatedly abused his daughter at his family’s home for nine yearsr in town San Vicente del Raspeig, according to the decision to which this newspaper has access. The real evidence was the statements of both the girl and her mother in court confirming the attacks. However, this statement did not serve to convict the defendant of a crime. sexual abuse crimeAllegedly, this situation happened many times in those years. In this case, only the daughter’s testimony counted because the mother did not witness these events; And Court did not find sufficient evidence to justify conviction The prison sentence requested from him was more than five years.
events occurred From the end of 2011 until April 22, 2020 At the family home in Colonia Santa Isabel de San Vicente del Raspeig. When the mother and daughter left the house, they filed a complaint. The abuse started when the girl was four years old.
The court is of the opinion that the defendant was proven during this period. He hit the girl’s butt, broke her toys, and stamped her bare feet on the ground. and struck him all over his body with his hand. Once a broom broke him in the back. There was regular abuse where he punished her with food deprivation and insulted her with phrases such as “”.“It’s useless, I’ll throw you out, you fool, you idiot, you’re subnormal, you’re stupid, I’ll break your head and you’re worthless.”. These attacks motivated the girl often locks himself in his room out of fear and avoiding regular contact with his father. The court convicted him of habitual harassment and ordered him to pay 5,000 euros in compensation to the minor in addition to the prison sentence.
The decision, in many cases, The girl was taking a shower, her father was entering the bathroom and he was staring at her even though she told him to leave. However, the decision does not consider that it has been proven that the defendant tried to sexually abuse the minor at least three times.
The statements of the girl and her mother became one of the main evidence of the court. The victim testified in the Gessel room, a special room where minor victims of abuse are questioned. Even though the abuse incidents were confirmed by the mother and other witnesses; This was not the case in the sexual abuse case, which no one could witness. «We have no other evidenceThe decision states that “there is no residue that would undermine the principle of presumption of innocence.”
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.