A who is the woman condemned his suffering rape and assaults by her ex-husband inside Palma de Mallorca refused to confirm his accusations In the case before the Magistrates Court. In the process claimed by the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, the complainant appeared before us as a special prosecution. 13 years in prison the defendant was on trial for sexual assault and ill-treatment, but no questions were answered at the oral hearing. The court warned her that without her testimony the case would lose mainstream support, but the woman remained adamant. “I do not want to declareHowever, the prosecutor continued his request for conviction based on the statements given by the complainant during the investigation. The man only confessed at trial arguing with him for not preparing dinner and his lawyer seeks acquittal.
The woman called Palma Local Police on the night of March 10, 2020. The agents found him on the street “in his pajamas and worried,” as they explained at the hearing. He told them that her ex-husband headbutted her and knelt on her genitals. Police officers revealed in court that their 20-year-old relationship had deteriorated, but they continued to live together “because he threatened to take their children.” The woman also said that It was usual for the accused to enter the bedroom and force her to give him oral sex..
The suspect was arrested and taken to the court on duty the next day. There he admitted to most of the charges. He admitted that he attacked his ex-wife that night and revealed it. He had forced her to perform oral sex “in angry situations” and threatened to “take her underground”.. He also said that he was aware that the woman was having an affair with another man. After this statement, the judge released him.
Denial and contradictions
Today, at the trial, the accused changed the story. He said this in court He accepted the facts as the lawyer advised him to do so. job assigned to him. “I listened to him to get out of there,” he said in court. Even then he assured me “was drunk“, although his arrest had taken place after he had had “a few beers” the day before. According to the version he presents today, he never attacked or raped the victim. He assured that the day of his arrest there was only an argument because he thought his wife should cook for him.
The plaintiff asserted his right not to testify against the accused because of his relationship that united him with the defendant. It’s unusual because your woman had personified as special accusation demanded compensation during the judicial process. The court decided that, after the applicant’s refusal to testify, she could not continue the case and her lawyer had to leave the courtroom.
With these mats, the prosecutor continued to demand 13 years in prison for sexual assault and ill-treatment due to aggravating reasons such as gender and kinship, and 20,500 euros for compensation for the woman. In his last defense, the prosecutor, despite the fact that the main evidence of the prosecution is the statement of the complainant, punishment may be based on previous statements and confession after the man was arrested
The defense lawyer, on the other hand, described the Prosecutor’s stance as “reckless”, as “there is no element to support the charge” and therefore the prosecutor “should have withdrawn the charge”.
The man did not want to have the last word and the second-instance court dropped the case. seen for punishment.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.