This Court of Alicante acquitted the only defendant. Assault and kidnapping of a Russian businessmanAleksei S. at his house in Bursa st john beach to grab the keys 300 bitcoins From the victim’s computers (at the current exchange rate of about five million euros), according to the sentence this newspaper was able to access. There was only one defendant sitting on the bench, Russian hacker Denis Katana, as the so-called mastermind of the coup. Living room not proven interference with the facts and questioned its credibility testimonies of two witnesses who accuse him, including the victim himself. The prosecution requested a six-year prison sentence for the failed assault.
The incidents took place at night. 16 August 2019 On the beach in San Juan, in an apartment where the victim, who had just returned from a trip, lived. They were waiting for him inside the house. three hoodedformer Russian soldiers who apparently entered with their own key They tied him to a chair and started beating him. and tortured him for almost two hours to force him to reveal the keys to cryptocurrencies. But the raiders had to run away Without loot for someone calling the intercom. Even though the building’s security cameras caught them, None of the attackers could be identified. they couldn’t meet fingerprints or DNA profiles in the House.
However, the victim targeted one of his colleagues, Denis Katana, as the mastermind behind this attack from the very beginning. As he told the police in those early moments, Denis was one of the few who knew he was going to be home that night, and he had copies of the house’s access key, a special code. number of copies restricted. Katana assured that she only had one copy of the key and gave it to the cleaning lady so that Aleksei could go and clean the apartment that afternoon, following her own instructions. When Denis returned it to him, he handed it over to Aleksei so that he could enter his house. Another copy of Denis had been interrupted earlier and was now unusable.
According to the judges in the decision, keys were not so special as there were at least three copies. while also appreciating more people knew that the victim would return that night. The traveler is not just the accused. Denis went so far as to blame the victim himself in his deposition, accusing him of fabricating the attack. “theatre founded by its own senders”. It emerged from the statement that the hoodies wanted to save the person. 300 bitcoins because another citizen accused him of stealing them. Denis, the other witness who accuses both Aleksei and himself of the kidnapping, money laundering via cryptocurrencies.
conflicting references
The victim testified at the hearing that the attackers had said that Denis had sent them while beating her. The judges find it contradictory that the Police said nothing about it when he got home and confined himself to blaming Denis for being one of the few who had a copy of the keys. That Aleksei jumped in the first moments “may be normal due to the shock of the attack“, the judges say. But they no longer see it as normal for “after seeing the cameras and verifying how they got in with a key, to tell the police that Denis might have an affair, but still not say anything. It is as important as the attackers themselves saying who entrusted the truth to them.” keep this information in the first moments “It doesn’t make any sense“, even after seeing how Denis was arrested in his presence.
The other witness accusing Denis was another Russian businessman, Dimitri, who was with the defendant at the time of his arrest. Days later, Dimitri came to the police station and said that Denis had told him that he had sent the attackers home, but that he was surprised. They were supposed to talk to him, not touch him. At the trial, however, Dimitri claimed that Denis admitted to him that he had sent hooded men home so they could violently take the money from Aleksei. The stories the judges tell come “contradictory”While Dimitri said he feared possible reprisals for his statement, he did not seek any protection.
The Chamber considers that these late statements of the two witnesses take away from credibility and they both have doubts as to whether Denis had learned of his involvement in other ways. “Relevant is doubt, which, without any other incriminating evidence, deprives these statements of sufficient force of conviction and necessarily acquits them in the application of the principle of in dubio pro reo.”
Sentencing in the National Court
Denis Katana is currently in jail and serving a prison sentence. four years in prison dictated by national audience to defraud five million euros to banks around the world Through a computer virus that he can manipulate ATMs from anywhere. He was not jailed for kidnapping. katana admitted his guilt computer fraud in a compliance case before the National Court in July 2021. The accused has always sought to link both the victim and the other witness who testified against him in this case to money laundering matters, and in Madrid courts several cross-charges, some mixed together.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.