Jury forces to increase sentence for accomplice for a showdown in Torrevieja

a popular jury didn’t believe the versionevaluated that his participation in the events was much more active than he said. According to this decision, the magistrate who presided over the people’s court made this decision. seven and a half years in prison as accomplice in a murder crime, according to the sentence this newspaper could reach. The perpetrator was sentenced on his own behalf. Up to 17 years in total for treason, murder and possession of illegal weapons.

The prosecutor and the defense had decided that the applicant should be sentenced to two years in prison, as they understood that there was an allegation of crime. insurmountable fear, the sentence that, according to the decision of the people’s court, this point cannot be applied in this case, as it has not been proven. Judgment of the two defendants compensation of 95,000 euros to the victim’s girlfriend and 42,000 euros to each of her parents; and another 20,000 to your brother.

The events occurred on 22 December 2020 In an apartment in Torrevieja where the 26-year-old victim was with the two defendants. The young woman was a member of an organization. was busy attacking other drug trafficking groups. While he was in the hallway of the house, he was shot in the head in surprise and unable to react. The two defendants ran away from home and went to Lorca. On the run, the material author of the crime burned his clothes in a tunnel under the railway line of the trainHe wore the clothes that the son of the other accused had left for him.

The sentence considers that the accused contributed to the death of the victim by his conduct, but proved “by an unnecessary or decisive contribution, i.e., dispensable and unnecessary for execution”. The judge assures that, based on the jury’s verdict, he was tried”facilitating the execution of the crime, ensuring that there is no obstacle to escape and blocking the exit door» to make sure the victim cannot escape.

Escape to Lorca

The defendant claimed that he acted out of fear that the murderer would also attempt him. The jury “the accused knew your partner’s activities they are based on his behavior after he fled to Lorca, where he had a few drinks and allowed his son to borrow clothes from the other accused. The popular court’s claim was that between 22 and 24 December, the day of his arrest, had “enough time” We do not think that he acted under an insurmountable fear, even though he acted and acted in a different way in the presence of the accused and nevertheless did not inform anyone and did not go to the competent authority.” They even state that: He lied during his deposition.

defense attorney, José Luis Alonso Lacalannounced to this newspaper that he was working on an appeal against the sentence. Community High Court of Justice. The woman was released while she was under arrest for these events.

At the time of his arrest that day Goodnightthe accused reassured Civil Guard agents that he had nothing to do with the murder and that they should leave him out.

No defense

The verdict considers it proven that the victim had no chance of defending himself against the bullet that ended his life. On the shot some sunglasses he didn’t even have time to take off because he just got home. The defendant claimed that he was acting in self-defense because he tried to shoot himself. But the sentence is a reminder that there is no indication that he was carrying a gun or any weapon. The jury decided that the defendant had received a different weapon than the one he had taken from the scene. Another weapon was found in a nearby container.however, investigators concluded that the gun in question was not at home, but came from the murdered woman’s car.

Killer firing the bullet that ended the victim’s lifeThe accomplice closed the door of the house so that he could not escape. These were the Civil Guard’s conclusions about how the murder was committed. The woman, torn between the two, could not react to defend herself.