this European Commission submitted proposals for Euro 7 regulations this Thursday. The new standard for controlling emissions of polluting gases is part of the European Green Deal policy advocating zero emissions by 2050. they admit from the commission itself that at that time 20% of the vehicles will continue to be combustion vehicles. This regulation aims to change and reduce CO2 levels for combustion engine vehicles in line with the air quality standards set by the Commission on 26 October.
The changes in the upper limit of nitrogen oxide (NOX) and other particulate emissions in diesel and gasoline engines are somewhat minor. and hybrid vehicles in the European Union. “There were more ambitious scenarios, we chose this. It’s not a matter of political arbitration, it’s that we’re all in the same war. climate changeThere is a strong commitment to ending burning by 2035 and we must help industry do everything possible to achieve this,” Industry Commissioner Thierry Breton said at a press conference in the European capital.
The rule is stricter, but there are no drastic changes that give diesel and gasoline an extra life before they are completely banned (on sale) in thirteen years. Given the risk of industrial collapse in the industry, manufacturers expected less restrictive measures. They are voicing their “concern” about the European Commission’s proposal from the European Vehicle Manufacturers Association (ACEA) and They think this measure could “slow down” the transition to ‘zero emissions’ transport.
nonsense
Manufacturers association, with current Euro 6/VI standards European Union already “has the most comprehensive and stringent standards for polluting vehicle emissions in the world”while insisting that car emissions in the region are “already at a measurable level” thanks to technological advances. Manufacturers have long criticized these planned measures. Carlos Tavares, president of Stellantis, said: “The investment necessary to meet this new standard and reach 2035 without fuel engines can be done, yes, but regulation sucks up time, money and engineering resources, which makes it nonsense. Let’s use it for something? The industry doesn’t need it, and that backfires.”
Renault CEO Luca De Meo continues this theory:Euro 7 is something close to defying physics. They want a combustion car to behave like an electric car 50 meters after starting the engine. It’s impossible, very complex, and will cost us a lot of money for a marginal impact on the environment. We would have to divert these resources from the real bet (the electric car), by having to invent new fuels, among other things. That’s why we say we don’t want Euro 7 under these conditions.”
Manufacturers state that “the auto industry takes its role in reducing CO2 (carbon dioxide) and pollutant emissions very seriously. In fact, last year we made a very constructive proposal for a new ‘Euro 7’ that will significantly reduce valuable pollutants. ACEA President and BMW CEO “So we improve air quality,” said Oliver Zipse. “Unfortunately, The environmental benefit of the (European) Commission proposal is very limited, while significantly increasing the cost of vehicles. It focuses on extreme driving conditions that are hardly relevant in real life.”
Trucks are penalized
ACEA also notes that the “Euro 7” proposal is “particularly harsh for trucks”, as it “totally neglects” the accelerated transition towards zero-emission vehicles and “ignores the impact of future CO2 targets for heavy-duty vehicles”. “To meet Euro VII, truck manufacturers will need to divert significant financial and engineering resources from battery and fuel-cell electric vehicles to vehicles with internal combustion engines. This will have a serious impact on our transition to electric vehicles. Zero emissions. Neither for the climate, nor for the health of people. And it’s not good for the industry”, valued Martin Lundstedt, for his part, Volvo Group CEO and head of ACEA’s commercial vehicles division.
Likewise, from ACEA, they consider the planned implementation dates for the Euro7/VII regulations (July 2025 for cars and vans and July 2027 for heavy vehicles) “unrealistic” due to the “many vehicle models and variants”. must be developed, designed, tested and approved before that date. “Therefore, Euro 7/VII runs the risk of being very complex and costly,” warned ACEA, emphasizing that brake wear and tire wear would also have a negative impact, as well as the contribution of particulate matter from sources other than the exhaust pipes. “overcome particulate emissions” from the tailpipes.
The idea of ​​the European Union is to protect the continent’s industry and encourage manufacturers to continue investing in achieving more efficient combustion engines with a separate standard for CO2 emissions on the way to full electrification by 2035.
Source: Informacion

Christina Moncayo is a contributing writer for “Social Bites”. Her focus is on the gaming industry and she provides in-depth coverage of the latest news and trends in the world of gaming.