In February this year, Diana Deets, who became known online as Coconut Kitty, died by suicide. The news shocked many. She was a well-known model who earned income through paid subscription sites. This article explores what happened to Diana and the factors that contributed to her decision.
Who Are the Models on OnlyFans
OnlyFans is a paid-access platform where creators offer exclusive content to subscribers. Because the site allowed publication with relatively few moderation requirements, some accounts featured photos of models in underwear or even without clothing. Amouranth has been cited as a prominent example of someone who built a substantial income from photos and videos. Coconut Kitty did not reach that level of fame, but she did turn her OnlyFans presence into a steady revenue stream.
How Diana Deets Became Coconut Kitty
Before diving into the story, consider the visuals that helped make her name. Her age was a topic of curiosity for many readers.
Diana was born on December 6, 1980, and at the time of her passing she was 42. She paid close attention to fitness and cosmetic procedures. Yet her face suggested she was past her thirties. Early on, she published photos with minimal retouching and still drew a large following. Her subscriber count on a major social network rose to hundreds of thousands, and she began to be recognized in public. She often spoke about feeling reduced to a doll-like image, though she had little control over how she was perceived.
Below is a glimpse of how she appeared without heavy editing.
In 2018, Diana began embracing filters and retouching more aggressively. She aimed to resemble anime heroines by enlarging eyes, adding long, voluminous hair, and applying features such as freckles. The look helped her reach a broader audience as she adopted the alias Coconut Kitty, sometimes rendered as Coconut Kitten or Coconut Kitty.
Her striking appearance attracted attention, swelling her follower base to about 3 million across platforms. Notably, roughly 11,000 people subscribed to her OnlyFans, with earnings reaching well over six figures monthly when counting paid additional posts. The Coconut Kitty page on the platform has since been removed.
Which version of her did you connect with more?
Uncover Coconut Kitty
On the wider web, many users scrutinize public figures. In June 2021, a blogger examined the similarities between Coconut Kitty and Diana Deets, suggesting they were the same person. Collages combining edited and unedited images were shared with subscribers, aiming to reveal the truth behind the online persona.
The analysis drew widespread attention. Fans of Coconut Kitty reacted by unsubscribing and leaving negative comments, frustrated by the realization that the online image did not always reflect real life. The reaction underscored the disappointment some felt when the public figure did not match the fantasy built by curated posts.
Soon after, a major magazine published a feature detailing the case, including an interview with Diana and comparisons to similar situations in the industry.
The model defended her choices, noting that many celebrities use retouching. She emphasized that her persona was a character created for a specific purpose, not an attempt to deceive. There was no evidence of any unauthenticated images on Coconut Kitty’s pages, though the public content did not clearly reveal the boundary between fiction and reality.
Despite the controversy, her audience remained engaged. Some followers did not mind the evolution of her image, while others simply stayed for the entertainment value. The business side of Coconut Kitty continued to attract attention, even as the public discussion shifted toward authenticity and consent in online media.
Were you familiar with Coconut Kitty’s work before this article?
Online Bullying as a Possible Factor
Public figures in the adult entertainment sector often face harsh scrutiny, including insults and threats. In Diana Deets’ case, some comments linked her use of filters to attracting audiences with problematic interests. The discussion touched on how online personas can blur the line between real identity and fictional characters, and how this ambiguity can trigger strong reactions from viewers.
Other voices argued that many people in this industry promote content for adult audiences, sometimes prompting concerns about exploitation or perceived manipulation. There were additional comments about how industry professionals debate ethical boundaries, licensing, and accountability in collaborations.
There were further discussions about the platform rules requiring models to be over 18. Violations can carry legal consequences for content creators and for those who obtain it. The broader debate centered on safeguarding measures and responsibility within the creator economy.
As a result of ongoing stress and public pressure, Diana Deets developed a mental health struggle over the past year, with reports from Western media highlighting the toll of public scrutiny on wellbeing. On February 12, 2023, she passed away.
—
Editors note: The writers do not condone the choice made by Diana Deets. If someone feels overwhelmed, seeking professional help, taking breaks from content creation, or stepping away from social networks can provide relief. Creativity should bring joy; if it does not, exploring new avenues or activities may be beneficial.
Were you familiar with Coconut Kitty’s work before this article?
End of piece