In March, AnTuTu’s developer team released their selection of the best Android smartphones, judged by user reviews gathered across the platform. The roundup provides insight into what actual buyers think about hardware, software experience, and overall value, not just official specs or what a single reviewer claims.
Leading the chart is last year’s flagship, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, which earned an overall positive impression of 95.4 percent from users. Close behind is the iQOO 12 with 95.35 percent, followed by the Honor X50 GT at 94.62 percent. These scores reflect consumer sentiment on speed, responsiveness, camera performance, battery life, and software polish across real-world usage scenarios.
Despite the Honor X50 GT not having the most cutting-edge specifications on paper, observers note that users particularly value its thermal management and substantial battery capacity. The device also stands out on price, costing around 2 thousand yuan, roughly 25.4 thousand rubles, which helps cement its position as the lowest-priced model in the top three and a compelling option for budget-minded buyers seeking strong everyday performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra secured the fourth spot in the rankings with a 93.81 percent positive rating, demonstrating that Samsung’s premium line continues to resonate with buyers after multiple generations of refinement. In fifth place, the Galaxy S23, the base model from the prior year’s lineup, achieved 93.57 percent, underscoring that even older configurations can retain strong appeal when they deliver a balanced mix of speed, camera quality, and endurance.
Rounding out the top ten are notable models such as the Oppo Find X7 Ultra with 93.33 percent, the Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro+ also at 93.33 percent, the Vivo X90 Pro+ at 92.87 percent, the iQOO 12 again at 92.06 percent, and the Nubia Z60 Ultra at 91.84 percent. The spread among these devices highlights how a broad spectrum of brands competes for consumer attention, emphasizing factors like display quality, software experience, and thermal efficiency as decisive in user satisfaction.
The data referenced reflects user feedback collected from March 1 to March 31, 2024, based on input gathered in China. This time frame captures how buyers responded to updates, new features, and price adjustments during a dynamic quarter in the Android ecosystem.
Historically, the March period has been cited as a peak for evaluating Android devices because it often coincides with post-launch impressions settling in after new models debut. The current list continues to illustrate a diverse field where several brands deliver strong all-around performance, and price remains a meaningful differentiator alongside raw power and camera versatility.