Roskomnadzor again raised the topic of limiting public access to information about the requirements from the Prosecutor General’s Office to block websites. This was reported by Kommersant.
The updated draft indicates that details explaining the reasons for blocking will also be taken out of public view. Internet hosting providers argue that these changes will complicate the management of access restrictions to sites. Experts say the new rules will influence public oversight of blocking rather than the day to day work of hosting services and providers.
As reported by Kommersant, the document includes alterations to how the information system operates, enabling operators to receive data about blocked sites more efficiently. Specifically, the proposal suggests removing the clause that would allow Internet users to see evidence of the Prosecutor General’s Office requirements for removing content deemed illegal in Russia.
Previously, Roskomnadzor had blocked more than 235 thousand Internet resources for fakes related to SVO for a two year period.
These developments come as authorities seek to tighten control over online content while balancing public scrutiny and administrative procedures. Observers note that the shift may reduce transparency around the blocking process, even as the system aims to streamline information flows to operators. The broader goal appears to be maintaining compliance with national information rules while limiting the exposure of blocking rationales to ordinary users.
Industry participants point to potential impacts on users, researchers, and watchdogs who rely on public access to understand why particular sites are restricted. The evolving framework underscores a tension between state oversight and the public’s right to know about how and why digital information is regulated. Analysts emphasize that the effectiveness of these measures will depend on how the information system is implemented in practice and how promptly operators can adapt to new reporting requirements.
In the end, the policy shift signals a continuing effort to control online discourse within Russia while shaping the transparency around administrative decisions. Policymakers and stakeholders will watch closely to see how the changes affect the balance between content moderation and public accountability. The dialogue surrounding this topic is likely to intensify as more details emerge from official channels. (Kommersant)