Roskomnadzor has added the accounts of Yegor Creed, Gusein Gasanov, Yuri Khovansky, and several other publishers to its register of banned sites. This update was reported by the Telegram channel Mash and reflects ongoing efforts to curb illegal online gambling promotions across major platforms. The move signals a broader policy stance that regulators are taking toward online content that facilitates or advertises gambling services without proper authorization.
According to Roskomnadzor, the channels managed by these bloggers were included in the list of sites subject to restrictions due to illegal advertising of online casinos on Twitch, Telegram, and Kick. The decision followed two formal appeals submitted by the Safe Internet League, an organization that advocates for tighter internet controls in the region. The authorities indicated that platforms should actively narrow access to accounts that breach established laws, thereby limiting the reach of content deemed unlawful or harmful.
Historical context shows a pattern of enforcement actions aimed at influencers whose live streams or channel content allegedly violate local regulations. In 2020, the channels of Yegor Creed, Hussein Gasanov, Yuri Khovansky, Albert Vasilyev, Nekoglay, and Andrey “Mellstroy” Burim — known by the moniker kyivstoner — faced bans connected to various misconduct allegations during live broadcasts. These cases illustrate how enforcement bodies monitor and later penalize activities that intersect with prohibited messaging or occurrences during streaming sessions.
There have also been notable episodes involving well-known members of the broadcasting community. For instance, a former popular Russian streamer faced scrutiny after a live stream in which he discussed resisting relocation to the United States and framed it as a political stance rather than an immigration matter. This instance underscores the role of public commentary in shaping perceptions of platform use and regulatory risk, particularly when it touches on residency and cross-border issues in a media context.
From a regulatory perspective, the situation highlights several operational implications for content creators and platforms. First, there is an emphasis on aligning promotional activities with national law, especially when the product being advertised involves regulated sectors such as online gambling. Second, platforms hosting user-generated content are urged to implement stricter moderation and enforcement to prevent illicit advertising from spreading. Finally, actors in the influencer ecosystem must remain mindful of evolving legal standards, as regulatory agencies continue to expand their reach across streaming and social platforms.
Observers note that such actions influence how audiences interact with streaming content and where they seek information about gambling-related services. Viewers are increasingly exposed to warnings and restrictions embedded within platform ecosystems, which may alter the visibility of certain channels and modify engagement patterns. The ongoing dynamic between regulators, platforms, and content creators serves as a case study in compliance, risk management, and the evolving governance of online media in the region.
For those following developments, the key takeaway is a clear signal from authorities: lawful advertising practices are non-negotiable, and platforms bear responsibility for enforcing compliance within their communities. The dialogue between regulator and platform continues to evolve, with announcements more likely to address enforcement standards, user safety, and the mechanisms used to restrict access to disallowed content. This ecosystem-wide shift underscores the importance for creators to understand not only current regulations but also the practical steps platforms take to implement them, including content review policies, takedown procedures, and audience-targeting restrictions. [Attribution: Roskomnadzor policy updates; Safe Internet League submissions; platform moderation guidelines]