Who is Hash?
– How can someone contact them?
“I introduce myself as Hesh. My aim is to act with a clear conscience, not for personal gain.”
How long has the hacker been active?
– About eight years. The individual began by studying programming languages, a common starting point for many in the field.
– It’s noted that this person joined KillNet. Why did they leave this group?
– The choice was to operate independently in this ongoing conflict, following a personal policy and not relying on any external organization.
attack potential
– First, Zarya is known for cyber incidents and a series of leaks involving influential institutions. Were there other notable attacks? Which ones stand out?
– Attacks targeted state institutions, including major operators in Western Ukraine, and involved collaborations with other hacking groups. There were also significant intrusions into the country’s leading analytical and market information centers.
Many initiatives are still in progress. Viewers will be informed as developments unfold.
– Have most of the sensitive documents from the SBU been published, or are there more revelations to come?
– There are still undisclosed items, with reasons varying. It is indicated that several official documents regarding current SBU personnel have surfaced in their materials.
– What are the consequences for the victims beyond reputational damage?
– The focus is on state and strategic facilities. In addition to reputation losses, internal documents—plans, correspondence, and employee lists—may be exposed. The attacks have pressured reevaluations of strategy, reassignments, and organizational reorganizations across agencies.
– Has there been any attempt to move stolen data to other law enforcement bodies?
– No direct handoffs to foreign authorities are described. An emphasis is placed on maintaining anonymity and security. Key publications appear on an official Telegram channel monitored by some law enforcement representatives.
– How is the information security of Ukrainian organizations perceived?
– Security levels vary by purpose. There is acknowledgment that not all facilities have poor defenses, though some systems lag. A nuanced view is offered on the state of cybersecurity across the country.
– Cybersecurity experts warn that targeting critical infrastructure could trigger severe disruptions. How feasible is this in practice?
– The possibility exists. The discussion notes the potential to disrupt services and outages, while stressing that such actions are complex and typically require collaboration. The goal cited is often to enable control or gather ongoing information rather than sheer destruction.
– Have there been discussions about attacks on industrial sites in Ukraine?
– There have been discussions about controlling facilities at a high level, though actual disabling actions were not undertaken. The narrative frames such operations as having wide-reaching consequences and emphasizes restraint, portraying themselves as warriors, not terrorists.
– Do pro-Russian hacker groups favor high-impact ransomware?
– The stated aim is to gain ground and intelligence rather than loud, destructive displays. Encryptors are described as a secondary scenario, used only in specific cases.
international relations
– From neighboring regions, which countries show observed activity against Russia?
– Latvia and Lithuania are frequently mentioned, with Estonia noted occasionally. The response time of their teams is described as rapid.
– Are Belarusians part of these hacking networks?
– Yes, many are involved, and they are described as allies who can be relied upon in various capacities.
– Have any Ukrainian affiliates relocated abroad?
– A substantial number have relocated and offer valuable assistance in collaborative efforts.
– Were there attempts by spies to infiltrate the group?
– Daily attempts are noted, with ongoing countermeasures and awareness to stay ahead.
– How is membership handled in Zara if someone wants to help?
– All members undergo thorough checks. The process focuses on experience, motivation, and potential risk indicators, followed by internal assessments of teamwork capabilities and readiness to engage in missions.
under the same roof
– In a prior discussion, it seemed there was hesitation about discussing links to KillNet. Is that accurate?
– Yes, there is a preference to keep certain connections private to avoid disrupting ongoing work.
– Was there ever a conflict with KillNet’s leadership?
– No direct conflict, but the group now operates independently and may collaborate with other teams. The name has changed several times as alliances evolved.
– Is Zara still tied to KillNet, or is it fully autonomous?
– It began as a KillNet initiative, with leadership roles involved. Today it operates independently, focusing on broader cyber operations rather than being confined to a single parent group.
– How does Zara differ from KillNet?
– Previously, the focus was exclusively on hacking rather than DDoS. The current approach emphasizes leadership by example across hacking, programming, and creative work.
– What does the head of Zara do?
– The leader values the group’s members, resolves disputes, prevents leaks, and upholds security and anonymity while maintaining a cooperative environment and external contacts. The leader emphasizes duty to the team and ethical boundaries.
– Are there other KillNet members within Zara?
– Yes, a significant portion of the team comes from KillNet. The goal of diversification is to improve management and information warfare effectiveness, especially as teams grow large.
– Which hacking networks are active alongside Zara and KillNet?
– Notable groups include Beregini, XakNet, CyberArmy, Anonymous Russia, RaHDit, DPR Joker, NoName057, and Zsecnet. It is suggested that only a few were founded by KillNet affiliates.
– Why do some groups prefer to form independent teams rather than operate as a single large group?
– Splitting into multiple groups makes management easier and creates psychological pressure for opponents, complicating threat assessment. It also allows for more flexible information warfare operations.
– Are there others in the wider circle that support these efforts?
– The speaker mentions several allied networks and emphasizes the ongoing nature of collaboration and the rapid adaptation of groups to evolving challenges.