A controversial promotional campaign unfolded in Australia when a model named Savannah, who shares content under the social media handle Westcoast Savage, promoted an OnlyFans account with a large banner displayed along a public route. The promotion reportedly generated a substantial income, with estimates suggesting earnings around 100,000 Australian dollars in the first week, as cited by DailyMail.
The banner was placed at the entrance to the city of Perth in early April, and its audacious approach quickly drew attention. Local residents reacted with anger, and within about a month the city government received hundreds of complaints. Critics argued that the promotion linked to OnlyFans contributes to porn addiction and could encourage sexual violence against women. Despite the volume of backlash, the city authorities did not remove the banner, and Savannah remained publicly unfazed by the criticism.
Savannah stated to reporters that she planned to produce a film within four weeks and would release a new promotional poster afterward. The forthcoming poster reportedly would feature her clothed and would redirect viewers to a charitable cause. The charity mentioned was Outfit Please, an initiative focused on collecting and redistributing unwanted clothing to support those in need. This pivot was framed by the model as a way to shift the promotional focus toward a socially beneficial outcome rather than direct promotion of the adult platform.
Publicly, Savannah defended the tactic by highlighting the banner’s effectiveness. She claimed that the first week of promotion yielded strong earnings and indicated intentions to expand the advertising effort to other Australian cities and potentially international locations. Reports note that this strategy aims to leverage visibility in high-traffic areas to maximize audience reach and engagement with the promotional material.
Context around the incident includes media coverage from outlets such as Socialbites.ca, which reported on the broader conversation surrounding OnlyFans promotions and their reception in different markets. The ongoing discussion reflects the tension between explicit content platforms and community standards, with authorities weighing concerns about public advertising, youth exposure, and local values against individual expression and monetization opportunities. This particular episode underscores how promotional tactics in the digital age can intersect with public space usage, regulatory scrutiny, and charitable causes in unexpected ways. According to DailyMail, the situation continues to attract attention from residents, policymakers, and media observers who are watching closely how such campaigns influence perceptions of online platforms and the communities they touch.