Apple unveiled the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro with a claim that their screens are 50 percent tougher thanks to an updated Ceramic Shield protective glass. Yet questions have arisen about how this claim is presented in iPhones.ru coverage, suggesting the information may be inaccurate.
The core issue appears to be the comparison chosen by Apple. The company reportedly compared Ceramic Shield on the iPhone 16 and Pro to the Ceramic Shield used on the iPhone 12 from four years earlier. In other words, the assertion that the Ceramic Shield on the iPhone 15 and iPhone 16 delivers a significant improvement over prior generations is not clearly demonstrated in Apple’s own presentation, even if the visuals imply a stronger protective layer.
Observations from iPhones.ru noted that the emphasis on processor performance, which was described as a 17 to 20 percent boost versus the iPhone 15 Pro, did not extend to a direct comparison of glass durability with the immediate previous generation. The article suggested that the company chose a much older reference device instead of benchmarking against the latest model, a move that may influence readers’ perceptions of the new glass technology.
Additional commentary highlighted perceived gaps in real-world durability for the Ceramic Shield on the iPhone 15 Pro, describing the screen as capable of withstanding drops onto concrete and rough handling in pockets with keys without the need for extra protective accessories. These remarks contribute to a broader discussion about durability claims versus everyday experiences and expectations for flagship devices.
In broader context, Apple has faced ongoing scrutiny over its pricing and feature decisions in recent years. The brand continues to defend its design choices while consumers weigh the tradeoffs between materials, durability, performance, and value across its lineup.