A deputy of the State Duma put forward a proposal aimed at reducing wear on cellular networks by changing how data is billed. The suggestion centers on curbing unlimited access to video platforms in order to trim the overall traffic taken on the network. This idea appeared in the deputy’s Telegram channel, where he outlined the rationale behind it and what he believes should change for the infrastructure to stay robust as demand grows.
The argument emphasizes that much of the infrastructure is shipped from major hubs to regional centers. As a result, the regions of the country face a pressing need to modernize and upgrade their telecommunications capabilities. Without timely updates, residents in many areas risk losing reliable access, which could hinder everyday communication, emergency services, and economic activity. The deputy suggests that reallocating how traffic is measured could influence the pace and direction of these upgrades, ensuring networks remain capable of handling increasing loads across the country.
According to the proposal, cellular operators should scale back the amount of data allowed under unlimited plans by removing the option for unlimited YouTube access. The deputy argues that video streaming contributes a substantial portion of traffic, estimating it between roughly one third and half of total usage. By shifting how video traffic is counted, operators could reduce strain on network equipment and potentially extend the life of hardware deployed in various regions. This approach is presented as a means to balance consumer experience with the long-term health of the network ecosystem. [Citation: State policy discussion; Telegram post of the deputy]
The deputy also asserted that a coordination among market participants could address concerns about fair treatment of traffic. He suggested that a joint decision, if reached, would count YouTube usage on equal terms with locally produced services. The stance reflects a belief that regulatory bodies may not oppose such a collaborative move if it promotes a more sustainable traffic model and harmonizes how different sources are billed. This point was framed as an opportunity to align incentives across operators while preserving user access to essential digital services. [Citation: Regulatory commentary; policy channel notes]
Earlier statements from a high-ranking member of a public body focused on information society development touched on broader issues. The speaker indicated that there is a perception of limited freedom of expression on the platform, with moderators seemingly enforcing standards in a manner that is clear and convincing in many observers’ views. The discussion highlighted ongoing concerns about moderation practices on major online venues and how these practices influence public discourse, user trust, and platform legitimacy in a regulated environment. [Citation: Public chamber dialogue on online platforms]
Recent scrutiny has also involved access to a number of accounts tied to Russian media and public figures. The discourse has centered on how platforms regulate accounts and maintain accessibility to content that is relevant to national audiences. The conversations underscore the tension between platform governance, national information policies, and the needs of residents who rely on social media and video services for news, education, and community engagement. [Citation: Platform moderation and access debates]