The rise in breast and hip volumes achieved with a non-absorbable gel led to a range of complications, eventually giving way to the lipofilling technique. This evolution was shared with socialbites.ca by plastic surgeon and candidate of medical sciences Vladimir Zlenko.
Using non-absorbable gels for breast and hip augmentation was associated with inflammation and the need for reconstructive surgery, he explained.
According to the doctor, the widespread employment of non-absorbable gels in cosmetic augmentation has driven up the number of corrective procedures.
The surgeon noted that the problems observed after these surgeries are still being addressed by plastic surgeons. The gel was promoted due to its low cost and rapid results, but many of these gels proved not to be absorbable. That caused inflammation and necessitated removal of the gel and sometimes portions of the surrounding tissue into which it had been injected, Zlenko explained.
Operations involving hip implants have largely fallen out of favor.
Hip replacement is not banned, but its frequency has declined each year. The placement of gluteal implants can be accompanied by complications such as implant migration or visible deformities, the doctor warned.
Modern lipofilling methods can deliver similar outcomes without the risks associated with foreign materials.
The plastic surgeon noted that after vaser liposuction, which minimizes tissue damage during fat removal, augmentation of the hip using the patient’s own fat is performed without incisions and without introducing foreign bodies. This approach reduces the risk of rejection and inflammation.
The discussion highlighted the shift away from implants toward fat grafting as the preferred option among many patients seeking natural contour enhancements.
In this evolving landscape, patient safety and long-term results remain central to decision making for both patients and practitioners.