In a discussion with Vladimir Kopylov, the father of Zhanna Friske, a sharp comment surfaced about Dmitry Shepelev and his son. The moment came as Shepelev attended a premiere of a TV series with his ten-year-old son, Plato, raising questions about visibility and parental rights in the public eye. Vladimir Kopylov’s public stance suggested that Shepelev had started to reveal more about his son to the world as a means to counteract waning fame, a claim that sparked strong language and heated responses from those close to Friske.
According to Kopylov, there is a fear among some family circles that certain actions could escalate beyond control. He described the TV presenter in harsh terms, emphasizing that the person in question lacks recognized talents and noting that future encounters could become tense. The statements reflected long-standing tensions surrounding the family and the way personal lives intersect with media attention in today’s culture.
Plato is identified as the son of Dmitry Shepelev and the late singer Zhanna Friske. Reports indicate that the child was born on April 7, 2013, in a private clinic in Miami. Over the years, various interviews have highlighted that Zhanna Friske’s family and close associates sometimes restricted access to the child, framing this as a response to concerns about his upbringing and exposure to public life. Olga Orlova, a former colleague from the pop group Friske belonged to, and who served as Plato’s godmother, has also described a distance from certain sides of the family, underscoring the complex dynamics at play when fame intersects with family matters.
As for Dmitry Shepelev, public reports illustrate a long-term relationship with designer Ekaterina Tulupova since 2018, with Shepelev co-parenting and expanding his family. The narrative notes that Plato does not photograph his mother in social networks but uses her name in conversation, which some audiences interpret as a sign of ongoing sensitivity around family roles. In 2021, Shepelev welcomed a second son, Tikhon, with Tulupova, a development that broadened his responsibilities beyond the early years of his first child’s life. Observers have discussed how public attention continues to shape the way he shares family milestones with the world, and how his roles as a father and a public figure coexist in a highly scrutinized space.
Earlier interviews concerning Zhanna Friske’s legacy and the family’s public narrative have left a lasting imprint on how fans and observers understand the child’s story. The ongoing conversation about Platon, his identity, and his relationship with both biological and step-parents illustrates a broader discussion about celebrity culture, parental influence, and the media’s role in shaping private life for viewers across North America and beyond. This coverage remains part of a larger discourse about safeguarding a child’s well-being while acknowledging the public’s interest in notable personalities and their families. In these dialogues, audiences often weigh the tension between personal privacy and the public’s curiosity, with experts advising careful, respectful handling of sensitive topics when discussing minors in the media. The situation also highlights the resilience of families navigating the complexities of fame, legacy, and intergenerational relationships within a modern media landscape, where every public appearance can become a focal point for reinterpretation and debate.
The broader public conversation around Dmitry Shepelev’s family life continues to evolve as new chapters unfold. Observers emphasize the importance of balancing transparency with discretion, ensuring that the primary concern remains the welfare and privacy of Platon and his siblings. As in many high-profile family cases, each development invites renewed discussion about the responsibilities of public figures, the boundaries of media access, and the enduring impact of parent-child bonds across generations. The narrative remains dynamic, inviting readers to reflect on how fame intersects with family continuity, personal growth, and the protection of a child’s developmental environment, while recognizing that every family story holds intrinsic value beyond the headlines that may surround it.