Plastic surgeon Denis Agapov weighed in on Borodina’s appearance after she reportedly pursued facial procedures. In a candid assessment, he stated that the TV host has undergone facial plastic surgery and he described the visible changes with a clinician’s eye, noting that such steps are not unusual for public figures who want to refresh their look. He explained that the work on her face points to deliberate refining rather than mere makeup, highlighting that public figures often balance aesthetic updates with their personal brand in a highly scrutinized environment.
He argued that changes in the nose and lips indicate surgical intervention rather than simple makeup tricks, and he observed that the rhinoplasty result appears well executed. The surgeon suggested that the alterations to the nose and lips reflect intentional sculpting, adding that the outcome aligns with professional cosmetic practice. This assessment underscores the difference between casual cosmetic tweaks and formal procedures that alter facial structure.
According to Agapov, lip contouring seems evident, though this would not surprise many observers. He added that shifts in the position of the eyebrow tails and the temple area could be the result of either meticulous makeup or a procedure called endoscopic periorbitoplasty, which targets the eye socket region. The distinction matters for how audiences interpret overall facial balance and harmony, which can influence public perception of a star’s appearance over time. The note from the specialist stresses that facial changes are multifaceted and may involve more than one technique.
The specialist outlined price ranges for the procedures, noting lip shaping can cost from thirty thousand to three hundred thousand rubles, rhinoplasty from eight hundred thousand to one million two hundred thousand rubles, and endoscopic periorbitoplasty around one million rubles. Based on these numbers, he estimated that Borodina may have spent north of two million rubles on facial surgeries, a figure that highlights the scale of cosmetic work some public figures pursue and the financial commitment involved in maintaining a certain look. This perspective invites reflection on how cost can shape decisions about appearance in the public eye.
In a broader context, Borodina previously spoke about her feelings toward the culture of plastic surgery. She expressed sympathy for those who constantly feel compelled to alter their appearance and said she favours moderation, arguing that cosmetic changes should not escalate into obsession. She remarked that the drive to undergo repeated procedures can feel like a disease, and she drew a parallel to how some people pursue numerous tattoos, suggesting both trends can reflect an unhealthy fixation when taken to extremes. The balance she advocates centers on self‑acceptance while recognizing the impact of public scrutiny on personal choices.
Earlier, Borodina had contemplated cosmetic changes in relation to her wedding plans, weighing how different options might influence her public image and personal identity. The discussions surrounding her preparations illustrate a larger debate about appearance, confidence, and personal agency within a society that closely watches celebrity styling and personal transformation. The situation serves as a reminder that cosmetic decisions are rarely isolated events; they interact with media narratives, brand considerations, and the evolving standards of beauty in contemporary culture.