The finale of Voice. Kids season ten sparked discussion about rehearsals and wellbeing of young contestants. The mentor known as MakSim, Marina Maksimova, commented on social media that the finalists had not taken a break before the live broadcast. She noted that eight-year-old Pavel Zilev was seen with torn ties after a long rehearsal period, and she described his performance as heartfelt and emotionally driven. Maksimova captured the concern she felt watching the team push through fatigue to deliver a strong showing on air. The show itself has generated public interest as viewers and media examine how child participants were prepared for the televised event.
The competition culminated with Anna Dorovskaya, an 11-year-old contestant from the Basta team, winning the tenth season with 52.8 percent of the audience vote. Milana Ponomarenko, aged 14 from the team led by Yegor Creed, finished in second place with 32.6 percent, while Pavel Zilev earned 14.6 percent for his third-place finish. These results reflect a dramatic season that captured audience attention and sparked discussions about junior artists and the pressures of live performance. News coverage surrounding the finale highlighted the emotional moments and the dedication shown by participants as they delivered finales that resonated with viewers.
In one of the standout moments from the finale, the show featured a candid message from the team and those close to the participants about the emotional investment and the intense preparation behind each performance. Reports from those involved with the program record the sense of pride that accompanied the finalists, as well as the unresolved conversation about how young performers balance practice, performance timing, and personal wellbeing during a competition of this scale. The public narrative around the finale thus combined admiration for the talent on display with ongoing questions about the support systems for young competitors.
The tenth season stands as a marker for the franchise in terms of how it presents and values its youngest contestants. It shows a mix of dramatic voting outcomes and heartfelt storytelling that keeps audiences engaged while inviting reflection on the standards and practices used to prepare child singers for national television. The overall arc of the season emphasizes both artistic achievement and the responsibility of mentors, production teams, and broadcasters to ensure safe and sustainable experiences for all participants. The documented outcomes, including the final standings and the emotional resonance of the performances, contribute to a broader conversation about child performance models in contemporary reality competition formats.
Culminating moments in the finale included remarks from the judging panel, as well as behind-the-scenes accounts indicating a high level of commitment from the finalists. Observers note that the season demonstrated a broad appetite for junior vocal talent, with audiences expressing strong reactions to the varied styles and stage presence of the top contenders across different teams. The champion’s family and supporters celebrated a milestone that signaled a successful, if intense, journey through the competition. As with previous editions, industry commentators and fans alike compared this season to earlier cycles, evaluating how the show retains its appeal while continuing to adapt to evolving expectations around young performers and their development as artists. Attribution: show records, media coverage of the finale, and statements from program participants and mentors.