Vladimir Torsuev, known for his role in the film Brother-3 directed by Valery Pereverzev, shared thoughts that suggest the project digs deeper than the world depicted in Balabanov’s Brother and Brother-2. He offered a candid assessment that the new work diverges from Balabanov’s canvas in both philosophy and moral inquiry, arguing that its thematic layers reach far beyond the scope of the earlier films. While he admires the first two installments, he refuses to pass judgments on their quality, emphasizing that evaluating cinema is not his place. His own view is that Bodrov’s protagonist embodies a deeply flawed character, someone whose actions reveal a moral ambiguity that challenges straightforward judgments.
According to Torsuev, Balabanov’s films captured a broad Russian audience through a combination of sharp direction and compelling performances. He suggested that the new project, while not revealing any plot specifics, would unfold as a collection of short narratives that together form a cohesive, thought-provoking tapestry. After reviewing the material, the actor reached out to the director with praise, expressing his belief that Pereverzev was crafting something uniquely ambitious and artistically significant. The sense of discovery and validation he felt underscored his conviction that the project possessed extraordinary potential.
In recounting the experience, Torsuev recalled a pivotal moment the morning after a screening session. He contacted Pereverzev to convey his astonishment and admiration, stating that the filmique approach displayed a level of genius that had not been seen in Russian cinema before. He noted that while the work may resonate more powerfully with festival audiences than with broader mass audiences, its artistic audacity and existential questioning mark it as a landmark experiment for the industry.
The public conversation around Brother-3 has included mixed critical voices, with some reviewers and peers offering pointed critiques alongside praise. Earlier, Viktor Sukhorukov joined that chorus by voicing a harsh critique of the film, highlighting the contentious elements that have sparked dialogue among fans and critics. The dialogue surrounding the project continues to evolve as audiences anticipate more insight into the director’s intentions, the actors’ performances, and the structural experiments that define this ambitious contemporary Russian cinema endeavor.