On a broadcast of the program Evil Tongues, Victoria Bonya, a well known blogger and television host, raised serious accusations about Vera Brezhneva. Bonya claimed that Brezhneva presented herself as a pristine, innocent star, but in her view the public image did not reflect reality. The blogger asserted that, in 2011, Brezhneva allegedly engaged in a sexual relationship in exchange for money. Bonya noted that a friend of hers had tried to reach out to the singer about these claims but did not like the terms that were proposed.
According to Bonya, Brezhneva allegedly worked as an escort by choice, with a supposed price tag around 100,000 dollars. The assertion was that payment did not automatically secure a sexual encounter and that the arrangement could include conditions beyond a simple date. The speaker described a hypothetical situation in which Brezhneva would request a luxury watch as an initial gift, valued at approximately 70,000 dollars. The argument continued that after presenting such a gift, a date could be proposed, and further activities might follow if the client wished, though the arrangement could be terminated if the client did not approve the terms. As the story unfolded, the friend observed Brezhneva’s preferences, and, given a watch choice and an extra 100,000 dollars, without a guarantee, the conversation ended with a firm farewell from the presenter.
During the same discussion, the show touched on Brezhneva’s personal life, including her divorce from composer Konstantin Meladze. Bonya claimed that a pattern of consequences followed the breakdown, suggesting that the musician left his wife Yana Summ and their three children to pursue a relationship with the artist. The program’s discourse framed the situation as a boomerang effect, implying that Brezhneva faced repercussions from past choices in her public life.
Earlier, Alana Mamaeva had mocked Bonya for undergoing plastic surgery, which added to the ongoing media chatter surrounding the figures involved. The broadcast illustrated how tabloids often weave together stories about romantic entanglements, wealth, and personal decisions, creating narratives that persist in public discussion despite a lack of independent confirmation. The episode underscored how celebrity reputations can be influenced by sensational reporting, rumor, and the revolving door of entertainment news, especially when claims hinge on unverified encounters and high-stakes financial offers. The conversations also highlighted audience interest in the pressures faced by public figures who navigate both professional demands and private life under intense scrutiny. In sum, the program presented a dramatic portrait of perceived contradictions between public personas and alleged real experiences, inviting viewers to consider how fame shapes the reception of personal histories in contemporary media culture.