The survey results reveal strong public engagement with the new film adaptation of The Master and Margarita. More than half of respondents, specifically 52 percent, have already watched or intend to watch the movie, according to the findings reported by kp.ru. The polling also notes that attendance at screenings reached a notable level, with about 8.1 thousand people participating in the survey process. This points to a timely interest in Bulgakov’s classic and signals that the cinematic interpretation has sparked conversation across diverse audiences in Russia and beyond.
A portion of participants, 9 percent, indicated that they already possess familiarity with the painting or visual arts related to the story, and many respondents expressed appreciation for how the modern film adaptation interprets the material. This enthusiasm suggests that viewers are weighing both the source text and its contemporary cinematic treatment, considering how the period setting, character design, and narrative pacing resonate with today’s audiences while staying rooted in the novel’s themes. The reception highlights a balance between reverence for the literary work and curiosity about how a fresh cinematic voice translates its symbols and moral questions to the screen.
One viewer commented on the film as a strong achievement, noting that it is entertaining and valuable, even if it diverges from the text in some respects. The depiction of Woland earned particular praise as among the top tier portrayals, while Margarita received a standing ovation for her performance. The observer described the experience as compelling and memorable, remarking that after earlier adaptations like the book and the television series, the new movie offers a distinct vantage point. The playful reference to a character described as a hippo injected humor and highlighted the film’s bold, idiosyncratic choices in character rendering that sparked discussion among fans and newcomers alike.
In another segment of the survey, eight percent of respondents said they planned to see the film in theaters, underscoring early consumer intent before the film’s wider release. When it comes to subsequent viewing options, 19 percent expressed interest in watching the adaptation on television once it premieres, while 16 percent preferred streaming the film online. A sizable group, 48 percent, indicated they did not intend to watch the movie, citing a fear of disappointment or a belief that the adaptation would not meet their expectations. These responses illustrate a spectrum of presumptions and risk assessments that often accompany beloved literary properties when they are adapted for different media channels.
Industry reports confirmed that on February 6, the project led by Mikhail Lokshin had secured more than 1 billion rubles at the domestic box office. This performance positioned the film as a record-setting release within Russia, marking it as the first Russian feature rated 18+ to achieve such a milestone. The financial success signals a strong appetite among audiences for bold, mature storytelling that engages with Bulgakov’s provocative themes while leveraging contemporary production values and star performances. The film’s trajectory reflects a broader trend where literary classics are reinterpreted in ways that challenge conventional expectations and invite new conversations among viewers, critics, and cultural commentators.
Earlier coverage by Yuri Grymov and others shed light on the public and media reactions surrounding The Master and Margarita as a cinematic project. The discourse encompassed debates about the film’s stylistic choices, narrative focus, and its faithfulness to the source material, with commentators weighing risks and rewards inherent in adapting a controversial and deeply layered novel. This ongoing dialogue highlights how adaptations become cultural events, capable of generating both fervent support and thoughtful critique, while contributing to the enduring legacy of Bulgakov’s work in contemporary cinema and popular culture.