The figure known as The Expected Person, sometimes simply called Expected, was painted in 1860 by the Austrian artist Ferdinand Georg Waldmüller. Today the portrait sparks lively discussion because a mobile phone in the scene has become the perceived hero, offering a modern twist on a classic work.
On social media, the talk centers on the young woman walking through the countryside in the painting and the idea that she could be a time traveler since the first smartphone appeared in 1992. The dialogue reflects how present-day life colors our view of quiet moments from the past whenever a small device appears.
What many observers notice is the teenager’s gaze, fixed on the screen in her hand, the device dominating attention just as it does in contemporary life.
Painting “Waiting for Woman” Ferdinand Georg Waldmüller
Art critics consulted by a British media outlet quickly clarified that the object in the hand is not a prayer book, but a modern device. The discussion underscores how audiences interpret technology through art, and how a single detail can raise broad questions about daily life across generations.
The canvas is displayed at the Neue Pinakothek, alongside hundreds of works from Munich spanning the 18th and 19th centuries, inviting viewers to compare historic scenes with current life and attention spans.
As some viewers noted with irony on social networks, the tiny detail of a young man in the lower right corner offering a flower to a companion adds a timeless note of courtship that mirrors the contemporary scene of flirtation under a screen’s glow, turning a quiet moment into a reflection on attending to human connection in a digital age.
If you have these apps on your mobile, you should uninstall them now.
It is not new for audiences to mistake artifacts for symbols of current technology. The phenomenon stretches back to earlier eras when people first connected with machines that reshaped how life is lived and seen. Artworks and devices have long sparked discussion about how much of today’s world is explained by the tools we carry and use every day.
The dialogue around Waldmüller’s painting shows how a single glance can bridge past and present, revealing how constant connectivity changes our sense of time, attention, and social behavior. Museums serve as a bridge for visitors to explore that shift, inviting reflection on how old masterworks relate to the digital culture that surrounds us now. This conversation reminds viewers that meaning in a work of art is often enriched by the context in which it is viewed, including the devices that occupy our hands as we consume culture.
The painting’s enduring relevance rests not only on its composition but on the conversation it invites about how modern tools shape interpretation, memory, and everyday life. Viewers are encouraged to consider how a small, overlooked element can become a focal point for questions about intimacy, presence, and the way technology reframes scenes from the past as if they were happening today.
The narrative continues to evolve as people compare the quiet, careful manners of 19th-century figures with the rapid, screen-driven pace of the 21st century. In this way Waldmüller’s work remains a living document of visual culture, showing that art can still illuminate how devices influence a person’s sense of self and their place in the world.