American actor Kevin Spacey has faced new allegations of sexual harassment, reported in court documents obtained from the case filed by a massage therapist who was not named in the complaint. The update comes as part of ongoing legal proceedings and coverage from entertainment outlets, including TMZ.
According to the plaintiff, Spacey arranged three sessions of extended massage therapy, each lasting about ninety minutes, at a room inside the New York Edition Hotel during August and September of 2016. The accounts describe behavior that the therapist says crossed professional boundaries and included offers of money in exchange for intimate acts, along with visible signs of arousal and requests for specific manipulation during the session.
The plaintiff asserts that Spacey proposed starting the massage from the buttocks region and that the sessions included yoga-like movements performed in a way that exposed the buttocks and genitals. The allegations also include a claim that Spacey wore a balaclava during some meetings. The therapist reports that following these encounters, his mental health deteriorated, with increased anxiety and signs of post-traumatic stress, which affected his confidence as a professional, a spouse, and a parent. Financial compensation is requested to address the alleged harm.
This is not the first time Spacey has faced harassment accusations. In a prior incident from 2016, another massage therapist brought forward similar claims, though Spacey publicly denied the allegations and the case was closed at that time.
On July 26, 2023, a jury in London delivered a verdict of not guilty on charges of sexual assault brought by four men. The actor maintained his stance that he should be allowed to resume his duties as artistic director of the Old Vic Theatre in London, amid ongoing public and media scrutiny regarding his career and personal conduct.
In the broader discourse surrounding his career, Spacey has faced a mix of legal outcomes and professional debates. After the verdicts in London, discussions persisted about his future involvement in theatre and film projects, as observers weighed the implications for his artistic legacy and the industry’s approach to accountability and due process.
Observers note that the case highlights ongoing conversations about consent, boundaries in professional settings, and the responsibilities of high-profile figures to uphold ethical standards. The public record reflects a complex tapestry of court resolutions, media coverage, and the lasting impact on individuals connected to the cases as the industry and audiences reassess the legacy of a once-celebrated performer.