Slava addressed the social media storm sparked by remarks from TV host Victoria Boni and blogger Natasha Krasnova, responding to the heated online debate that followed the broadcast. The exchanges unfolded after Boni and Krasnova criticized Slava’s conduct on the program Evil Tongues, prompting the artist to offer clarifications and reflections about what happened and what was alleged. The sequence of posts and comments painted a picture of a confrontation that quickly spiraled into a broader discussion about norms, fame, and the pressures that come with being in the public eye. Source: Entertainment News Desk.
According to Boni and Krasnova, Slava’s on-air behavior raised questions about what is considered acceptable during a public appearance. Boni recalled an incident at a previous event where the artist reportedly consumed a large amount of alcohol in a short period. Krasnova, stepping into the dialogue, described her interactions with individuals at a strip club and recounted stories and photos that allegedly showed Slava visiting the establishment. The blogger claimed the singer not only attended but also engaged in performances there, including a claim that she danced and supposedly injured a leg. Slava’s team later positioned these claims as sensational and misrepresented, arguing that the narratives pushed on the show were designed to entertain at the expense of accuracy. Source: Media Watch Canada/USA Compilation.
Slava pushed back at Boni, suggesting that Boni herself sets what is normal in the public sphere while acknowledging that the true judgments about such behavior would be made by a much larger audience beyond the limited seating of a single venue. The artist asserted that the celebrity landscape is not determined by one host or one critic, and hinted at the idea that certain power structures reward particular forms of television performance. Slava implied that threshold of acceptance is determined in the broader halls of the industry, not in a single commentary, and noted that television often amplifies certain types of spectacle that can shape reputations more than facts alone. Source: Industry Commentary Central.
In addressing the claims, Slava stated that only a portion of the stories presented on the program could be trusted as factual. The artist contended that there had been openness about visiting strip clubs as a way to unwind, and she acknowledged enjoying both male and female performances. She further explained that drinking occurred as part of the routine that helps some performers relax, but she emphasized that any injury mentioned in the discussions did not happen to her at those venues. Slava framed her activities as normal personal choices within a demanding career, emphasizing that her health and well-being remained a priority while she continued working. Source: Celebrity Rounds Review.
Throughout, Slava challenged the tone and accuracy of the surrounding commentary, arguing that Krasnova’s critique carried a sense of inconsistency. Krasnova had claimed to be at a strip club to conduct book research, yet Slava noted that the blogger had appeared in similar settings on other occasions, which raised questions about the consistency of the narrative being presented. Slava’s account suggested that the line between observation and sensationalism can blur easily in public discourse, especially when personalities are involved. Source: Public Discourse Monitor.
Ultimately, the exchange highlighted how public figures navigate storytelling in the media era, where every remark can be magnified and reframed. Slava’s response underscored the idea that personal boundaries and professional boundaries often intersect in controversial conversations, and that the truth can become a moving target when partisan narratives gain traction. The episode illustrated the tension between entertainment value and factual accuracy, and it reminded viewers that public perception is frequently shaped by selectively presented details rather than a complete record. Source: Media Ethics Journal.