William Baldwin publicly reacted to Sharon Stone’s remarks about a 1993 encounter on the set of Sliver, where she claimed that producer Robert Evans pressed for an intimate relationship with the actors. Deadline reported on the exchange and its fallout from the cast and crew involved.
In Baldwin’s view, Stone’s comments resurfaced questions about past behavior and boundaries in Hollywood productions. He indicated that Stone’s narrative was still a point of contention years later and suggested he was not a party to the supposed advances. Baldwin recalled a moment during the production in which he says Evans contemplated staging a final intimate scene with Stone in a way that would spare him from participating in a kiss. He asserted that he urged the arrangement and described his own pleas during that period, recounting a sense of discomfort complicated by the film’s demands.
According to Baldwin, Evans allegedly warned that he might disclose sensitive information about the actors if the stories continued without change. Baldwin mentioned the possibility of incorporating such disclosures into his forthcoming biographical work, framing the potential revelations as leverage in a longstanding dispute over recollections from the set.
Stone has stated that Evans attempted to foster an intimate relationship with her on the Sliver production. She described the producer as convinced that a strong on-screen chemistry would help secure the movie’s success, despite her rejection of the advances. Stone also reflected on broader decisions in the project, noting that the involvement of writers and casting choices did not align with her perspective, and she felt that a different actor might have contributed different dynamics to the film’s leading role.
In this ongoing dialogue, the retelling of events from the set of Sliver continues to surface as a touchstone for discussions about authorial choice, industry power dynamics, and how past experiences shape the memories of those who worked on classic projects. The various accounts highlight the complexities of producing a thriller in the early 1990s, the pressures actors faced, and the way public narratives around these incidents are remembered and reinterpreted over time.
Several years after the film’s release, conversations around the Sliver production have lingered, drawing attention to the motivations behind casting decisions, the balance of creative control, and the responsibilities of producers in managing on-set conduct. The public discourse surrounding these episodes remains nuanced, with different individuals offering perspectives that reflect their own experiences, interpretations, and careers in the industry.
Observers note that the Sliver period sits at a crossroads of Hollywood intimacy stories, professional boundaries, and the evolving conversation about consent in the entertainment world. The dialogue continues to influence how later productions address similar topics and how actors, filmmakers, and critics engage with longstanding memories of behind-the-scenes dynamics.