A well-known psychologist and television presenter, Mikhail Labkovsky, has taken legal action amid the unauthorized sale of his books on the Wildberries marketplace. The allegations center on sales that violate his rights as the author of the best-selling title I Want and I Will. Labkovsky has filed a lawsuit seeking nearly 3 million rubles from the individual entrepreneur Khizri Aleydarov for distributing his works without authorization.
According to the Shot Telegram channel, the Eksmo publishing house holds exclusive rights to distribute the psychologist’s I Want and I Will series. Eksmo has recently pursued legal action against Aleydarov over similar infringements, with a claim amounting to around 2.85 million rubles tied to unauthorized sales on the same platform.
In a separate development reported at the end of September, a footwear company filed a lawsuit against Wildberries for damages surpassing 200 million rubles. The case involves brands such as Enzo Logana and Lagatta. Representatives noted ongoing market difficulties in recent years, including issues at Wildberries warehouses where shoes stored for return by customers suffered damage caused by pests, a factor cited in the dispute over liability and compensation.
Earlier coverage mentioned that Ekaterina Mizulina had filed a statement against Pasha Technik, indicating continued regulatory and legal scrutiny surrounding online marketplaces and the sale of branded goods and related literature.
The unfolding cases illustrate a broader pattern of enforcement actions aimed at protecting intellectual property and brand integrity within digital marketplaces. They also highlight the tension between authors, publishers, distributors, and retailers as online shopping platforms expand their role in distributing physical and written products across major markets in Canada and the United States. Industry observers say these actions reflect growing expectations for clear ownership rights, verified supply chains, and robust complaint mechanisms to curb illicit sales and counterfeit goods while balancing consumer access to literature and popular media.
Scholarly and commercial voices alike are watching how courts interpret terms of exclusive distribution, the scope of rights granted by publishers, and the responsibilities of platform operators when faced with suspected infringements. At stake are not only the financial stakes involved in each lawsuit but also the broader implications for authors who rely on digital marketplaces to reach audiences and maintain control over their published works. As cases proceed, both creators and platform operators may be compelled to strengthen verification processes, implement more stringent takedown procedures, and improve transparency around rights ownership to reduce unauthorized distribution and protect the interests of legitimate rights holders.
In the Canadian and American contexts, observers expect similar disputes to surface as marketplaces continue to grow, making this a timely example of how intellectual property law and e-commerce converge in the digital age. Legal experts emphasize the importance of clear licensing agreements, robust enforcement mechanisms, and proactive rights management to minimize similar conflicts and safeguard the rights of authors, publishers, and brands in a borderless online marketplace.
These proceedings also underscore the need for consumers to be aware of the provenance of goods purchased online. When customers encounter issues with items bought through marketplaces, they can expect that rights holders will pursue remedies that align with established consumer protection frameworks, while platforms strive to balance accessibility with compliance and respect for intellectual property rights.