The rumor surrounding Nikolai Drozdov’s health was addressed by a close associate, Konstantin Miroshnik, who dismissed claims of a serious illness as untrue.
According to Miroshnik, Drozdov had attended an art exhibition the day before and appeared fit and lively. He stated that the reports claiming a malignant tumor had been found were entirely false. Miroshnik explained that Drozdov had previously endured a difficult injury when a rib damaged a nerve near the spine, which temporarily affected his vision. Medical intervention later restored his sight, and Drozdov recovered gradually over a long period. He was at the opening of the current exhibition, looking well, standing independently, and in good spirits.
Miroshnik also criticized media practices, suggesting that some outlets rely on sensational stories to boost ratings. He implied that journalists often select a figure of interest and attach sensational headlines to attract attention, thereby inflating the perceived resonance of the story. He advised that public figures should avoid provoking others and keep communication calm and straightforward. The implication was that the public figure does not deserve hostile framing and that clearer reporting would benefit both audiences and stations alike.
The false cancer claim originated from a message circulated by a Telegram channel named Shot, which asserted that doctors were preparing a chemotherapy plan for Drozdov. This allegation contributed to a broader discussion about how misinformation can spread quickly through online platforms and influence public perception. When such rumors surface, they can touch people personally, prompting examinations of the responsibilities that come with reporting and sharing information about someone else’s health.
Previously, the health status of Nikolai Drozdov had been a matter of public interest following multiple hospitalizations. In light of recent events, observers emphasized the importance of verifying details through reliable sources before publishing health information about public figures, and of presenting updates with sensitivity to privacy concerns and the potential impact on fans and the individual involved. Attribution for information in this narrative is provided to the parties referenced, with emphasis on caution and careful verification in journalistic practice.