Anatoly Rysakov, a businessman, pursued legal action against pop icons Alla Pugacheva and Kristina Orbakaite over disputed land in the Solnechnogorsk district. Reports circulating on a Telegram channel summarize the case as a direct challenge to the artists’ summer properties and the structures erected near them. The developments were described in what is attributed to the Shot Telegram channel, which covers entertainment and regional news in Russia.
The dispute began in early October when Rysakov filed a lawsuit that demanded the removal of scaffolding at the summer residence of the two performers, located in the village of Berezhki. He argued that the construction impeded access to the coastline and disrupted his fishing activities, presenting the case as a nuisance linked to property use and enjoyment of the nearby waters. According to the filings, the obstruction appeared to affect local circulation and the use of the shoreline, which the plaintiff claimed to be his legitimate area of interest. The claims were noted by Shot as part of a broader pattern of land-related disputes involving notable public figures in the region.
Following filings, an independent inspection was conducted to assess whether there were real violations on the plots controlled by Pugacheva and Orbakaite. The inspection reportedly found no violations within the boundaries of the artists’ properties, and as a result the court dismissed the businessman’s demand for the scaffolding’s demolition and related remedies. Shot highlights that the Solnechnogorsk region hosts multiple artist estates, including one site associated with Pugacheva and two tied to Orbakaite, underscoring the area’s prominence as a hub for celebrity residences in close proximity to the capital. These details are presented by Shot in its coverage of the case.
Prior to this action, Rysakov had already pursued similar lawsuits that targeted other well-known singers. He had previously brought a case against Natasha Koroleva and Philip Kirkorov over scaffolding on their properties. In another part of the region, his allegation involved an obstruction at a yacht pier on the singer’s estate on a peninsula near Myakinino, further illustrating the pattern of disputes related to access and boundary issues around celebrity estates. The report notes these prior attempts in the context of the ongoing legal activity surrounding land use and property boundaries in high-profile households. Shot’s coverage links these earlier efforts to the present litigation, suggesting a broader strategy on the part of the plaintiff.
Meanwhile, in a separate legal development, comedian Ruslan Bely, who has been designated a foreign agent in the Russian Federation, submitted a claim addressing the status of a foreign representative. The action signals ongoing attention to how individuals and media figures are labeled and treated within various regulatory frameworks. These concurrent items reflect a period of heightened attention to legal and civic matters involving public figures and notable personalities in Russia. The report places Bely’s filing within the wider discourse on governance and public accountability in the arts and entertainment sphere. Shot provides this update as part of its ongoing coverage of legal and celebrity-related topics.
In a related note, the media previously reported that actor Nazarov criticized Maxim Galkin, who has also faced designation as a foreign agent in the federation, over the artistic works of the late musician Viktor Tsoi. The discussion about songs and performances in the context of political or administrative designations illustrates a broader intersection of culture, law, and public policy that has drawn attention from various outlets. The ongoing dialogues around ownership, permissions, and public accessibility to private celebrity properties continue to unfold in regional reports and comparative analyses, with Shot contributing one perspective among many in the regional media ecosystem.