Following the hearing, Elena Blinovskaya was taken to the pre-trial detention center No. 6, known as Pechatniki, where she was placed under custody. This update comes from a Telegram channel that aggregates information from various sources. The report notes that there was no plan to use a dedicated transport for Blinovskaya. Instead, the procedure involved a route where the vehicle would first circle Moscow to pick up other detained young women from courthouses and police offices, and only after gathering these individuals would the convoy proceed to the detention facility. The arrangement highlighted the logistics of moving several detainees at once and the coordination required among different law enforcement and court agencies.
Earlier, a Moscow court modified the blogger’s preventive measures and ordered that she remain in a pre-trial detention center until April 26. The decision marked a change from prior conditions and reflected the court’s assessment of risk and compliance with the terms of detention. Blinovskaya had appeared in court on January 22, with prosecutors asserting a violation of the terms of house arrest as the reason for tightening the preventive measure. Sources indicate that at a gathering described as a party, there were around 15 attendees, including a key witness with whom Blinovskaya was forbidden to communicate. The case involves a potential sentence that could reach up to 16 years in prison, underscoring the severity of the alleged offenses in the eyes of investigators.
In the course of the investigations, Blinovskaya was also linked to alleged violations of Article 187 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which addresses the illegal circulation of means of payment. The two aspects cited by investigators relate to this financial crime charge and to the broader context of the actions that led to the new preventive measures. The evolving narrative surrounding the case reflects the seriousness with which authorities are treating breaches tied to house arrest and the legal constraints that accompany it.
What follows in this ongoing reporting is the procedural progression through which Blinovskaya’s legal status is interpreted by courts, as well as the implications of these steps for public perception and the broader conversation about legal procedures, closures, and the rights of individuals in similar situations. The information available through various outlets continues to be updated as the investigation and court actions unfold, with officials expected to provide further details as they become available.
In the meantime, observers note that the involvement of a lawyer and the presentation of new accusations against Blinovskaya have kept the case in the public eye. The evolving charges, the specifics of the evidence, and the timeline of events will likely shape both the defense strategy and the prosecutorial approach in the weeks ahead, as all parties navigate the legal processes and the standards of proof required in this matter.