Natalya, the wife of Alexander Kuzmin, who was held for ten days after a stunt in which a woman rode on the car hood, recounts that her husband has not reached out. The situation has left her feeling unsettled and uncertain about what comes next.
She describes a sense of being overwhelmed by the events and the lack of a clear way forward. It’s not simply a moment of panic; it feels like a loop of miscommunications and missed chances. She has not sought help from others because she believes it would be futile to pull people away from their own paths for something that seems so uncertain. As for her husband, she notes that he lives in her apartment and often answers calls, yet there are moments when messages go unanswered. This uncertainty adds to the strain of the day-to-day life they share.
Her account also mentions that the husband frequently uses his bank card, which raised concerns given an anticipated trip abroad. While the musician did not show concern for his wife’s condition, Kuzmina states that she would not abandon her belongings, especially after being brought to a special detention center in a swimsuit. The contrast between his actions and her expectations paints a stark picture of their current dynamic, revealing tensions that extend beyond the immediate incident.
Kuzmina adds that she observed the man’s willingness to assist the woman in fulfilling a wish she had expressed. According to her, the intention was for the woman to ride on the hood of a car and to participate in a swimsuit photo shoot. This description helps to clarify the sequence of events that led to the detention and sheds light on the intentions behind the actions, as perceived by those involved.
The chronology of events shows that Kuzmin was charged the day before with a ten-day detention order, of which four days were already spent in a special detention facility. This context helps to explain the gravity of the case and the impact on the individuals connected to it, including the families and friends who are following the developments with concern.
Earlier statements from Mogilnikov suggested that Yura Borisov had requested that an on-set confrontation be addressed with emphasis on a physical display. The details of these remarks contribute to a broader narrative about the pressures and expectations surrounding the scene, the responses of those involved, and the consequences that follow. It remains a point of discussion as observers seek to understand how such situations unfold and what they reveal about the choices made by different parties in the heat of the moment.