Showman Stas Baretsky has spoken to socialbites.ca, claiming that an agreement to acquire the fortress owned by Alla Pugacheva and Maxim Galkin in the village of Gryaz has been finalized. He asserts that this development prompted a response from sources close to the Diva, who suggested she would not be allowed to sell her residence.
According to Baretsky, the deal is completed and irreversible. He stated that a press conference would be held for journalists in the coming week to present and verify the documents involved. He indicated that the purchase has been sealed, diminishing the relevance of what certain Pugacheva or Galkin relatives might say. He described his actions as securing a tool for work, joking about a combination of precaution and purpose in his approach. He added that there is no urgency in moving or unpacking, suggesting that the logistics or funds for relocation are not yet in place.
Meanwhile, relatives of Alla Pugacheva told mk.ru that the singer does not intend to leave her castle in Gryaz. They recalled that in March 2022 she left Russia for Israel with her husband, Maxim Galkin, and their children, citing international travel and shifting residency as part of a broader pattern in their lives.
In April this year Baretsky reportedly told reporters that he had purchased the Gryaz fortress for 450 million rubles with the aim of converting it into a morgue. Following the assertions, producer Sergei Dvortsov denied the claim, stating that another businessman had indeed taken possession of the castle. Locals and adjacent neighbors also expressed uncertainty about the true owner, offering no clear confirmation of Baretsky or anyone else’s control over the property.
The ongoing discussions around the Gryaz fortress have drawn attention from observers who monitor high-profile property movements connected to prominent cultural figures. The situation highlights how real estate tied to public personalities can become a focal point for rumor, media speculation, and legal debate alike, especially when conversations involve locations with symbolic or historical significance.
Observers note that the tension between public statements and private arrangements often surfaces in cases involving celebrities and luxury properties. The dynamics can involve multiple parties, including managers, relatives, and business associates, each presenting a different narrative about ownership, intention, and timeline. In Gryaz, this mix of public interest and private dealings has created an atmosphere where official documentation and personal accounts may diverge, at least in early reporting.
As the story develops, questions remain about the true status of the fortress, the specifics of the sale, and the strategic motives behind turning such a property into a morgue or any other facility. Stakeholders emphasize the importance of verifiable documents and transparent communication to clarify ownership, intent, and timing for any future steps. In the broader context, this episode reflects how celebrity-linked real estate narratives can unfold, driven by timing, media interest, and the sometimes opaque nature of private transactions.
Industry watchers suggest that further statements and official records could shed light on what is happening in Gryaz. They anticipate additional details, including confirmations of ownership, valuation breakdowns, and the exact purpose behind any proposed alterations to the structure. Until such information is publicly confirmed, the story remains a blend of reported claims, counterclaims, and the cautious language of all parties involved, underscoring the complexities of celebrity real estate scenarios and the unpredictable path of high-profile property deals.