In a candid conversation about the latest novel, the author lays out a vision: the book exists as its own reality, and not every reader will grasp every nuance. It is acknowledged that some readers may welcome the themes with open arms, while others may approach them with hesitation. The novelist speaks frankly about whether this work reads as a traditional novel and notes that the story uses sexuality as a prism to explore broader topics. The core truth remains that the subjects addressed may feel uncomfortable to certain audiences, and readers will inevitably bring their own experiences to the interpretation.
The work is described as a book that challenges common assumptions about masculinity, desire, sex, and eroticism. It raises questions rather than offering tidy answers, deliberately avoiding judgment so readers can navigate the many gray areas the narrative travels through. The author emphasizes that life is rarely black and white, and the novel reflects that complexity through its characters and scenarios.
Regarding how the writing process affected the author, the interview reveals that creating the story helped examine personal patterns and steer away from certain issues, yet it did not provide definitive answers. With time, things become more unpredictable, and the author notes a growing tolerance for uncertainty.
On the relationship between this book and previous work, the novelist explains that although the fiction is crafted with a personal touch, the author remains intentionally selective, drawing from lived experience while maintaining clear boundaries between fiction and autobiography. Dialogue often centers on literature, and the author willingly enters conversations about reading as a central theme.
The discussion touches on the idea that literature can be an intimate declaration of love, even a transgressive act if it lacks reciprocity. When the author finishes writing, a close relationship with the text seems to fracture as the work enters the public sphere and is subject to readers’ interpretations. This is viewed as a natural consequence of writing, as once the book is released, it develops its own life in the hands of readers.
The novel is described as one that blurs boundaries among love, gender, age, and pleasure, emphasizing the fluidity of human experience. The author argues against narrowing sexuality into fixed categories, suggesting that people may evolve over time and that age can shape how love is felt and expressed. The characters are presented as individuals who experience sexuality in ways that feel authentic to their moments in life.
Facing the question of personal identity, the author admits that embracing a different life path can be daunting, especially within a society that often imposes guilt or shame on such transitions. The author reflects on a background of openness, shaped by education and cultural exposure, with influences ranging from early encounters with diverse identities to those seen in popular culture. This awareness informs the narrative and the portrayal of characters who navigate self-discovery.
The conversation considers the idea that choosing a nonconformist path can be seen as a revolution, a bold statement that challenges rigid expectations. The author views this stance as emblematic of individuality, resisting labels, and choosing to live authentically, even in the face of social scrutiny. In today’s context, that stance is framed as an act of personal truth rather than a rebellion for its own sake.
There is also exploration of the protagonist’s aspirations regarding the female form. The author notes that rather than closing doors, the narrative keeps things open-ended, allowing space for multiple interpretations and recognizing that nothing in life is strictly fixed. The portrayal of the female body is handled with a sense of openness and complexity, avoiding simple categorization.
Sex is addressed not as a diagnostic subject but as an element best imagined and felt. The author defends imagination in literary depictions of intimacy, preferring suggestion and inference over explicit depiction. In an era saturated with sexual content, the book invites readers to project their own experiences and fantasies, crafting meaning individually as the doors of perception are opened or closed by the reader’s gaze.
When readers encounter explicit scenes, the author notes a preference for avoiding didactic explanations. The aim is to let readers construct the meaning from the details and the context, rather than being told what to think or feel. Direct statements about characters’ bodies and desires are minimized in favor of leaving room for personal interpretation and discovery.
Regarding how many of the described bodies and their surroundings are drawn from real life, the author explains that while some anecdotes were influenced by real stories, most of the material is a product of imagination. The approach emphasizes inventing elements from scratch, accepting the risk that readers may connect more with the author in the characters than with the author themselves, and acknowledging moments where the imagery is deliberately intensified for artistic effect.