Rapper Vacio, born Nikolai Vasiliev, publicly addressed the controversy surrounding his attendance at Nastya Ivleeva’s event described in some reports as a party featuring provocative attire. A video from his appearance circulated on a major news outlet’s Telegram channel, amplifying discussions about the incident. (Source: RIA Novosti)
In a statement aimed at clarifying his intentions, Vasiliev explained that the event was about creating his own image and shocking the audience as part of a spectacle. He acknowledged that he was photographed with participants he did not personally know, and he emphasized that his goal was not to endorse any particular movement or agenda. He also asserted that he does not support LGBT organizations and condemned what he described as propaganda associated with them, adding that his actions should not be read as political advocacy. (Source: RIA Novosti)
Additional reporting noted that on December 21, the Mash Telegram channel reported the musician’s stance on his appearance at the event, highlighting his choice to wear minimal clothing as part of the performance. Vasiliev argued that public appearances with scant attire should not be misinterpreted as a statement or apology, stating that concerns about arousal were not his problem and that he would not alter his dress to accommodate external judgments. (Source: Mash Telegram channel via RIA Novosti)
Following the broader media coverage, legal consequences were detailed by authorities. Vasiliev was subjected to a 15-day administrative detention after a ruling that cited minor hooliganism under the Russian Code of Administrative Offenses. In addition, a substantial fine was imposed for acts described as propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations, with the penalties reflecting the state’s stance on public demonstrations perceived as promoting such subjects. (Source: Russian Federation Administrative Offenses Code and related reports)
These legal actions occurred amid a wider national debate about freedom of expression, public morality, and how public figures navigate the boundaries of artistic performance and political messaging. Observers noted the tension between personal creative expression and the legal framework that governs public behavior in Russia. The updates contributed to ongoing conversations about how media coverage shapes audience perception, and how political and social norms influence the reception of celebrity actions in contemporary society. (Source: various contemporary reports)
In related context, prominent names from the Russian entertainment world have historically been cited in discussions about national identity and public roles. At times, figures who are treated as national icons face scrutiny when their actions intersect with cultural standards, legal constraints, and international perceptions. This episode with Vasiliev adds another chapter to that evolving narrative, illustrating how celebrity behavior can trigger debates that extend beyond entertainment into public values and governance. (Source: broad media coverage and cultural commentary)