Chartered Support for Women Affected After Medical Procedures by Surgeon Timur Khaidarov
An attorney for the involved parties, Elena Senia, has indicated that performers Slava and Lyubov Uspenskaya are prepared to offer financial help to women who suffered serious outcomes following procedures performed by surgeon Timur Khaidarov. The information was reported by a major news outlet.
According to Senia, the artists plan to provide financial assistance to women who urgently require corrective or additional surgical treatment while legal actions against Khaidarov proceed. The two performers also aspire to organize a charity concert, with proceeds earmarked for those in greater need. The goal, as described by Slava and Uspenskaya, is to ensure the assistance reaches individuals who require it most.
Senia characterized the artists’ involvement as an exceptionally noble extension of their public roles, reflecting a commitment to community welfare in a moment of crisis for many women.
In July, Slava publicly criticized the surgeon, alleging that the results of her breast surgery were substandard, noting asymmetry and troubling scarring. Khaidarov responded by stating that the singer did not adhere to recommended post-operative scar care instructions.
Lyubov Uspenskaya also weighed in, expressing agreement with Slava about dissatisfaction with the post-surgical outcomes. As the discussion intensified, an additional group of women, totaling fifty-two, signed a collective letter raising concerns about the surgeon’s practices. Senia continues to represent the victims’s interests in the legal process, coordinating with the newly formed advocacy effort.
Earlier, there were public disputes involving other parties accusing one another of manipulating the narrative related to the case. The broader situation has drawn attention to patient safety, consent, and the responsibility of medical professionals in cosmetic and reconstructive procedures, as well as the role of public figures in supporting affected individuals.
Across the case landscape, the central theme remains clear: when medical outcomes fall short, the community and those with influence may mobilize to provide relief and advocacy for affected patients, while legal channels work to resolve the disputes and determine accountability.