Singer Prokhor Chaliapin has openly discussed his cautious approach to his estate, revealing that he prepared a will as a precaution. He emphasized that the arrangement is meant to protect his loved ones and prevent misunderstandings about how his inheritance should be handled. The conversation highlighted a practical mindset about wealth, family dynamics, and the responsibilities that come with having assets in the public eye. The singer noted that his preparations are not a reflection of distrust toward family members, but rather a strategic move to keep peace and clarity long after his voice has faded from the concert halls.
Chaliapin stressed that a central goal of his planning is to ensure that his mother’s brother Sergei and Sergei’s children, especially Sergei’s son Pavel, do not receive any portion of his estate. He explained that there have been strained relations with these relatives for a long time, and potentially complicated family ties could complicate future decisions. By setting clear boundaries, he aims to prevent disputes and protect the welfare of those he cares about most. In his view, fairness to his nearest kin requires definitive guidance on who is included and who is excluded from inheritance considerations, so the family drama does not overshadow his artistic legacy.
“Sergei Ivanovich is my mother’s brother, and Pavel is my cousin, so neither they nor their children will receive a ruble from me,” he stated. He added that this resolve is not born out of anger but out of a careful assessment of past conflicts and the hope for a smoother path forward for everyone involved. He also expressed a personal wish that he would have many more opportunities in life to build a lasting family and, in turn, provide for its security without ambiguity. The singer hinted at ongoing efforts to refine his estate plans, underscoring that he believes in proactive preparation as a form of responsibility toward the people who matter most to him.
In a separate note, Chaliapin mentioned that recently he learned of a real estate development where an apartment—described as a substantial residence with cinema features—was left to him by a friend’s grandmother. The residence was part of a larger complex estimated at around 400 square meters, a scale that reflects a significant asset within his broader living arrangements. He chose not to disclose the name of the deceased benefactor, explaining that his connection with the woman was built on mutual respect and warmth. The story illustrates how personal relationships can intersect with financial matters in the lives of public figures, sometimes triggering consideration of how such gifts influence one’s own plans for the future and the responsibilities that accompany large properties.
Earlier, Chaliapin had spoken out about the way some fellow stars reacted to a terrorist attack on Crocus City Hall, urging a more measured and respectful response from the public figure community. He used the moment to remind listeners that fame does not grant immunity from human sensitivity or accountability, and that leaders in the arts should model restraint and empathy in the face of tragedy. His reflections on that event align with a broader theme in his public persona: the balance between public life and private duty, and the ethical responsibilities that come with influence. Through his comments, he encouraged a thoughtful discourse about how artists handle crisis, memory, and the ongoing duties they owe to their families and fans alike.