A Russian rapper known as Pasha Technik, whose real name is Pavel Ivlev, spoke to socialbites.ca about a troubling incident where unidentified individuals struck him and stole his jacket, an item valued at 250 thousand rubles. Ivlev explained that he did not report the incident to the police because his friends identified the attackers and promised to recover the garment. He added that an iPhone 15 Pro was tucked into the jacket’s pocket, but a separate side disputes that claim.
Ivlev recalled the events with difficulty, noting that he had consumed champagne that night. The jacket’s price tag had been substantial, yet he preferred to settle the matter through a private agreement. He emphasized that there was no official police involvement because mutual acquaintances intervened and located the perpetrators. Although they managed to bring the jacket back the following day, Ivlev said it arrived too late for him to retrieve it. Presently, those involved appear willing to return the item, yet Ivlev has concerns about whether to escalate the situation through formal channels.
A key point Ivlev raised concerns the iPhone 15 Pro, which had been in the jacket’s pocket. He asserted that the phone could not have fallen out, given its secure placement, while others contested the claim. This disagreement has added to the uncertainty surrounding what was originally inside the jacket when it was stolen.
Around the same period, Ivlev’s former wife, Eva Karitskaya, used her messaging channel to report that the musician had been assaulted and robbed. She described injuries to Ivlev’s face and the loss of the expensive jacket, suggesting that selling a rare item would be difficult for thieves. Karitskaya also posted a photo of the alleged intruders, who had previously posed with the Technician in a photo session and who, she claimed, coerced Ivlev into his home. The broader description included loss of a jacket, a phone, and apartment keys.
Karitskaya spoke about a troubling pattern in Ivlev’s circle, noting that several acquaintances seemed to take advantage of his volatile condition. She hinted at a recurring trend where Ivlev’s belongings were taken during moments of distress, painting a picture of vulnerability that extended beyond a single incident.
Additionally, the public record mentions that Hofmannita, a fellow rapper, had previously published a photo with the Technician during a period described as rehab. This bit of context has contributed to ongoing public interest and discussion surrounding Ivlev and his associates, prompting discussions about personal security, the handling of personal property, and the pressures of life in the music scene.
The incident raises questions about how such thefts impact artists who blend high-profile exposure with challenging personal dynamics. When possessions like a cherished jacket and a prized phone become focal points of a dispute, the seriousness of the matter goes beyond money. The potential reputational consequences for Ivlev, the perception of his circle, and the expectations of fans all intersect in a moment that invites careful, measured responses. In this case, the parties involved have indicated a willingness to find a resolution without escalating to formal legal action, but the situation remains unsettled as conflicting statements about the items and their whereabouts continue to circulate.
Observers note that the music community often grapples with episodes where personal safety, asset protection, and the reliability of trusted friends intersect in complicated ways. Ivlev’s experience underscores the importance of clear boundaries, prompt documentation, and the value of seeking professional counsel when incidents threaten both personal well-being and creative momentum. For now, the jacket, the phone, and the keys remain at the center of a tense, evolving story that fans and critics alike are watching closely, hoping for a fair and transparent resolution.