Natalia Gulkina has described a dramatic shift in her personal style and ethics that now guides her choices in fashion and food. In a recent interview on Channel Five, she explained that she no longer keeps luxury fur pieces for herself. Instead, she gives natural fur coats to friends, turning items she once valued into thoughtful gifts. This behavior reflects a broader rethinking of fashion, animal welfare, and personal responsibility that has shaped her life in the long term.
The singer shared that her transformation began with a simple decision to become vegetarian. Her stance on wearing fur or leather evolved into a firm opposition to such materials. Alongside this change in wardrobe taste, she also reevaluated her diet and has stopped consuming meat. These steps show a deep commitment to humane values and ethical living that extend beyond appearance to daily living and personal beliefs.
Gulkina emphasized that these changes have been steady for more than a year, underscoring that this is a deliberate, sustained realignment rather than a short lived phase. The path she describes appears to be walked with intention and reflection, rooted in consistent ethics rather than a public gesture or momentary protest.
A personal anecdote ties the narrative together: she once gifted a close friend an expensive mink coat with a lynx hood, a luxury item purchased years earlier at a substantial price. Today, she prefers to donate anything created from natural fur to friends, letting go of ownership while preserving the symbolic value of the item as a charitable gift rather than personal use.
In the same period, Gulkina disclosed a decisive shift away from alcohol. She has abstained completely for nearly a year, describing a time when the urge to drink faded away and never returned. This change marks a clear evolution in her relationship with alcohol and presents a broader pattern of mindful choices in her lifestyle.
Among other entertainment news of the moment, Katerina Shpitsa appeared in the press with a separate matter involving a dispute at an airport table. That incident stood apart from Gulkina’s narrative and represented another public moment discussed by the media around the same time.